AATUCAGG: Lesson 39 - Gravity and Light Waves

Plan your chaos in intricate detail

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Gravity
• Light
• Waves
• matter
• mass
• fractal
• galaxy
• moon
• sun
• human
• alien

[CACBCCCU]

Thanks for putting up with my hogging of the recent comments space here.

I wanted to mention the Higgs field. I see Higgs particles as carrying even less energy than gravitons, and unification of the forces a low energies becomes the task of representing all the force-carriers as being as various faster-cycling configurations of Higgs particles that cycle the slowest of all. The nuclear forces would simply express a quantized version of what happens at the galactic scale with gravity waves.

[aatucagg]

np =) Very interesting. Comment as you like!

[CACBCCCU]

There should be an "is" after the first "that" in the previous comment.

The comment below that should have "frequency proportional" instead of "period proportional" and is missing some apostrophes.

I doubt that individual gravitons can be detected, btw. Also, how they'd escape BHs is an interesting question. It's by tunnelling and/or superluminality, I suppose.

[aatucagg]

Yes. Very interesting . Is there some material I can read refering to what you are talking about? Thnx.

[xxxcoolboyxxx]

Are you a Physics professor or something? You are very good at it.

I am doing engineering Physics in university and I am very intersested in it

[aatucagg]

I hope someday you can add more insight to my theory. Maybe one day you will prove mass is composed of matter and light.

[CACBCCCU]

@aatucagg

Probably one of the most interesting coincidences I've noticed this year is that the ratio of the electromagnetic force to gravity for two protons is very close to the ratio between the radius of typical galaxy such as the Milky Way, or Hoag's galaxy (10^21m), and the radius of a proton (10-^15m), the ratio being about 10^36. It reminded me of Dirac's large numbers hypothesis. I have some recent comments under "Mystery of Antimatter" and under a video about NGC 7049. Thanks again.

[CACBCCCU]

@aatucagg

If you google "graviton" "black hole" and "tunnel" or "superluminal" you'll find discussions on that sort of thing. On review, some of my comments on this page are about things I haven't given much thought to lately.  More specifically, superstrings seem to be more esoteric vs. useful than ever to me now, and the Higgs mechanism does not fit naturally in with my way of looking at quantum gravity. I'll add some comments later about some ideas I've been working on lately. Thanks.

[CACBCCCU]

It's reasonable to expect that quark confinement and spacing is attributable to rotation in the orientation of the relevant force carrier, supposedly the weak force's W vector boson. As a weak boson is massive it must rotate within a very small distance. FWIW, I question whether unification of the forces requires probing beyond the strong force scale.

[CACBCCCU]

By "a quantized version of what happens at the galactic scale with gravity waves" I am referring to a wave-based push/pull effect defining the probabilistic extent of the "particle." A galaxy, in effect, could be seen as a gravity particle, or beam cross-section, that is finely quantized in space and time as a fraction of its volume. That's also apparently why Hoag's Object appeared so much like a diffraction ring when it was viewed less-clearly.

[CACBCCCU]

I think of a contradiction being resolved by considering a unified Higgs as being a high-energy composite of some large number of scaled-down undetectable low-energy Higgs particle analogues.

[CACBCCCU]

I suppose at some level we are saved from the need for further layers by the medium at that layer not being significantly tasked by what occurs at higher layers. It's somewhat like saying being cooped up in an ocean is no big thing for the molecules of water in whirlpools, it does not impact them greatly to be spinning so.

[CACBCCCU]

typo: "a low energies" should be "at low energies"

The massive high-energy version of a Higgs particle, which physicists talk about, apparently only would exist when it's too hot for other force-carrier particles to condense out of the Higgs field, thus the forces are unified into the Higgs force. To say there is a Higgs particle is also to apparently suggest an even more fundamental medium for the Higgs force, an underlying structural layer with even lower energies and longer waves.

[CACBCCCU]

One last note for the moment, the idea of orbital bifurcations in space on the Planck scale, where string theory takes over, is maybe somewhat reminiscent of the path selections that silica molecules may take as they build a skeleton for a radiolarian.