Heroes Volume 4 Season Finale Review
Uploader Comments (sarcasticduck44)
All Comments (56)
-
The whole problem with heroes falling from grace began in season 2. The writers strike forced them to end the season prematurely and forced them to change, what would have been, the greatest season!
-
Heroes started gd. Season 2 better. But then it started contradicting itself in 3 and repeating Hiros whole self destiny thing. It went shit. end of
-
@sarcasticduck44 1 disagreement I had with people was about Skyler. They kept saying he was wishy washing and changing from good to bad. Well, I think they got exhaustion from wating from week to week and season to season which clouded their perception. I watched all seasons back to back renting them on Blockbuster Online. And he never shifted. He was manipulating people, but he was evil all the way through until the very end when he truly changed. He was just playing people other times.
-
they killed my interest in heroes when they didn't show the syler vs nathan/peter fight. It just showed me that the show had no balls what-so-ever. They had an entire half a season devoted to "Villains" with barely any hero vs villain fights..ever since season 1 they had just been pussying out on ANY real fights and fans just had enough. I know I did.
What's the point of all these powers if no-one ever used them against each other..that's why sylar was the greatest because he USED his powers!
-
@sarcasticduck44 I thought the "NOOOO!" was just a tad awkward - I wanted to be sad but I found myself snickering. I also thought the whole Peter taking down Sylar as the President was badass. BEST MOMENT EVER! And doesn't Sylar have empathic memory, could explain why Sylar could control Claire but your theory makes sense too.
I'll tell you how HEROES should have ended. It shouldn't have ended! Bunch of panzee whiney babies complaining about 1 character ruined it for all the fans. then NBC made the awfully stupid decision to just stop the show without giving fans a true ending. All that time and money fans put into the show, then they just take it away. If it weren't for CHUCK I'd never watch NBC again for that crap slap in the face. Can you tell I'm mad still?
hootyhaha 1 year ago
@hootyhaha LOL yeah I've come to terms with it now but believe I was PISSED at first. in all honesty the show's writing was pretty bad, but I still loved it, and would've liked to see a proper finale. it sure had its issues but still loved the show! and fuck nbc, I totally agree.
sarcasticduck44 1 year ago
we cares about that(mohinder)
ariedajwa 1 year ago
@ariedajwa I don't! Not when his filler narration takes up soooo muchhh timeee! In season 1 it was short and to the point, and actually had some substance worth keeping in. Now, it's just kind of babbling for them to prove that they can still perform up to season 1's standards, and to fill up a bit of time, which makes 0 sense because of how rushed the episode felt towards the end! LOL rant over.
sarcasticduck44 1 year ago
Well, in my opinion, Angela acted that way because Nathan was sort of her Golden Boy (or is that Peter, I get confused)
LVCEBREROS23 1 year ago
@LVCEBREROS23 Yeah I can see her acting that way, maybe it was just the way she said that "NOOOOO!" that made me feel so awkward... and I do too! Ik Nathan was Arthur's Golden Boy but as far as Angela goes in season 1 it seemed like it was more Peter towards the beginning, agh! Her relationships with her sons are weird! LOL
sarcasticduck44 1 year ago