ITP Spring Show 2009 video compilation
Top Comments
All Comments (49)
-
indeed it is.
-
Sorry, after I wrote my comment I forgot about the possible existence of ghosts. My bad.
-
They wouldn't have souls. They were designed to make art. It is a machine designed to do something. In this case, it is supposed to make art. Besides that, a "soul" isn't anything at all. We don't have any further life beyond the point that we die. We just have a temporary working brain.
-
NO.. They Don`t hava Souls!!
But They Are Impresive!!!
-
I'm as serious as Phillip K. Dick. Your analogy is screwy. You're saying the robot is a "work of art"? Also, the brush is inanimate so your second argument is not logical. Much like an artist, the robot decides where and when to apply paint.
-
@ 2:59 Ethical conundrum: when robots make art, do they have souls?
-
wowser !
-
is that kipkay on 1:46
wtf all that shit suked
DayLight95 2 years ago 7
I hope you're not serious. A machine that makes something that looks like art is a work of art, not an artist. It would be like saying that the paint brush has a soul because it puts the paint on the canvas.
LunarRick1 2 years ago 4