what a stupid receiver. he is the one that put his helmet down and rammed the defender's helmet. u can easily see the the defender went to tackle by his shoulder.
If a defensive player does not lead with his helmet, then unless he hits a defenseless receiver or the quarterback there is no penalty for helmet to helmet contact. So no, he should not have been penalized.
what a stupid receiver. he is the one that put his helmet down and rammed the defender's helmet. u can easily see the the defender went to tackle by his shoulder.
louishasbrouck 2 months ago
@Elduders Actually, its called medical field, where we now know what a helmet to helmet hit can cause -_-
oreo2393 3 months ago
The hit is fine and is entertaining. Fuck u kids are such pussy mom raised fags now days.
Elduders 3 months ago
i dont know why you put illegal in quotes when it was an illegal hit
alexawesomeguy 3 months ago
@FROSTEE562 ah ok thanks :)
StalkerNinja8 3 months ago
@StalkerNinja8 he LEAD with his head leading with head=illegal hit
FROSTEE562 3 months ago
@FROSTEE562 why is it so?
StalkerNinja8 3 months ago
If a defensive player does not lead with his helmet, then unless he hits a defenseless receiver or the quarterback there is no penalty for helmet to helmet contact. So no, he should not have been penalized.
Supastar721 4 months ago
Legal!!!
2starsuper1 4 months ago