Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Relevancy and Reach of the U.S. Sentencing Commission

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
22 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 20, 2012

ACS and the ACLU hosted "The Relevancy and Reach of the U.S. Sentencing Commission." During the height of the War on Drugs, in 1984, the U.S. Sentencing Commission was created. The intent behind the Commission was to provide uniformity to the sentences ? many of them drug sentences ? that were imposed upon federal criminal offenders. However, instead of eliminating racial and other disparities as intended, the mandatory guidelines perpetuated disparities and took away judicial discretion. Judges? hands were tied, with many of them forced to render sentences that they felt were unfair and unjust, especially when it came to sentencing for crimes associated with crack cocaine.

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court deemed these federal sentencing guidelines in violation of the Sixth Amendment in U.S. v. Booker. While the Commission could continue to advise on proper sentencing, the guidelines would be advisory. In the years that have followed, the Commission has continued to play a prominent role in sentencing, most recently generating attention for its decision this past summer to make federal crack cocaine sentencing guidelines retroactive after the enactment of the Fair Sentencing Act. In the wake of this controversial decision, questions surround the Commission, namely, does the Commission remain valid and legitimate in purpose today?

Opening remarks by Kanya Bennett, Director of Programs for Criminal and Civil Justice, American Constitution Society and panel discussion featuring:

Moderator, Jesselyn McCurdy, Senior Legislative Counsel, ACLU
Honorable Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts; Chair, U.S. Sentencing Commission
Amy Baron-Evans, Sentencing Resource Counsel, Federal Public and Community Defenders
Douglas A. Berman, Robert J. Watkins/Procter Gamble Professor of Law, Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University
Michael Volkov, Partner, Mayer Brown

Closing remarks by Laura Murphy, Director, ACLU Washington Legislative Office

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more