#7: Wisconsin Planned Parenthood Ignores Sexual Abuse Case

Learn more: http://LiveAction.org

Watch our undercover video from another Wisconsin Planned Parenthood that shows medical misinformation:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=UIXHrusvMDw

Watch our previous videos showing sexual abuse coverup at other Planned Parenthood clinics at:
http://liveaction.org/index.php/proje...

Our videos have resulted in a Planned Parenthood staff firing and resignation, and the Birmingham Planned Parenthood clinic being placed on probation for 9 legal violations.

In response to this video, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin CEO Teri Huyck said, "In this particular circumstance, we did not have the name of the young woman. She did not give it to us. She did not provide any ID. So we were unable to make any report." EXCEPT we DID give that information to Planned Parenthood...watch this video of us doing that and proving her statement a lie:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hbiAXJP3XsQ

Media coverage of this video:
NBC 4: http://bit.ly/cFlQTO
Journal Sentinel: http://bit.ly/a6jkp1
HotAir: http://bit.ly/bAdS6c
LifeNews: http://bit.ly/diN3z4
Daily Caller: http://bit.ly/cfOrnl

Planned Parenthood Location:
302 North Jackson Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202

Video recorded:
June 25th, 2008

Video recorded by:
Lila Rose & Jackie Stollar of Live Action

Media contact:
Lila Rose, media@liveaction.org

• Category

  Nonprofits & Activism

[shaylenebrown]

Okay... the whole point here is that this wasn't REAL... The girl went in to trap them so she wasn't really pregnant and it was a made up 31 year old.

The other thing is... the girl probably wasn't pregnant... and probably didn't fill out the paper work and couldn't go through with an abortion when she wasn't pregnant.

Sounds to me like the woman was telling the underage what she needed to... once she had the info who's to say she wouldn't of turned it in????

[LiveActionFilms]

The fact is, Planned Parenthood was given months to report and they never did. Planned Parenthood even said they should have reported this but did not get the girl's full name. We did give full name and released video showing that. Just search for "Wisconsin Planned Parenthood CEO Caught in Lie "

[melancholyid]

I love how you always use these moronic, no-win scenarios to try and "trap". For starters, you label this "Sexual Abuse", yet you make it abundantly clear that in the fictitious scenario that 1. the sex was consensual, and 2, the actress was lying about her age to the man.

So, the nurses choice was either A - give her the abortion she wants, B - report her and an innocent man goes to jail, or C - turn her away and be seen as reluctant to help.

[LiveActionFilms]

This isn't a trap but modeled after real world scenarios. Planned Parenthood had two choices...follow the law or break the law and not report child sexual abuse. We didn't force them to do anything. They chose to break the law.

[melancholyid]

Yeah. well I noticed that you didn't bother to note that with your pimp scenario that they actually called the FBI.

And yeah, law. findlaw . com / state - laws / child - abuse / wisconsin/

Why don'y you read what constitutes child abuse, and then try to make the scenario work. Read especially the basis of reporting. That's what I mean.

[LiveActionFilms]

PP sent a letter after our pimp scenario to the FBI 4-7 days after we investigated. That isn't prompt reporting. Their letter stated that they thought they were getting investigated by us, not that child trafficking was going on. What took them so long to do something?They also failed to list some of the places we investigated and included places that we did not. They are a mess.

[LiveActionFilms]

"yet you make it abundantly clear that in the fictitious scenario that 1. the sex was consensual, and 2, the actress was lying about her age to the man."

That is factually false. Our undercover reporter clearly states that the 31 year old older man knew exactly how old she is. See the convo at 2.40. It is all right there.

[LiveActionFilms]

Every state in the United States says that sex with a child is rape whether the child agrees to it or not. Until a child reaches the "age of consent" in a given state, they cannot consent to sex, just like they can't consent to enter into legal contracts untill they are 18.

[AllForHimNotMe2013]

God bless you Lila. I admire you so much. Keep on going undercover

[ConservativeBrew]

Lila, keep up the good work!

[Marissa Chavez]

this is fake! that "14" yr old makes her sound so innocent. ugh!

[hooper1826]

Do people really think that this undercover work is much different than a police officer sending a minor into a gas station to buy beer ? If an establishment, or organization is built on integrity, we would not consistently see the law being broken like in this case and the many other cases. Lila, you are doing amazing work for life and justice, and anyone who argues the logistics behind your operations is ultimately on their last straw of defending their obtuse perspectives. God bless!

[n4kma]

Pro-lifers, learn the TRUTH about Abortion & Choice. Most abortions are unwanted or coerced. Many are forced. The legalization of abortion has facilitated the coercion of many girls/women into having unwanted abortions. Learn what you can do about it. Go to theunchoice(dot)com & clinicquotes(dot)com.

[Gooch1989]

Wait that was a counselor that was referring someone to planned parenthood.

[mediaphotographer]

@melancholy I listen but your mosaic of facts just doesn't work. Religion was already there before that technology ever exsited. The printing press did not start religion Yes, it helped spread religion, but not a directly related to technology, as you comment claim to offer. Ask any theologian. I have my brother in law who is one. Your claim is not justified or that relgion and technology are related. Try again with another angle, that one did not work either.

[mediaphotographer]

You own words are pretty clear, In your own mind. You still refuse to answer the question. "How does technology connect to religion"? Try again to answer the question relating to a statement you made and not wander ok? I am curious for your rebuttal.