Upload

Inside the Fukushima I Nuke Plant Reactor 2 Containment Vessel, 1/19/2012

arevamirpal arevamirpal·66 videos
153
174,954
Like     Dislike 7

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like arevamirpal's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike arevamirpal's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add arevamirpal's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Jan 19, 2012

TEPCO conducted the endoscopy of the Containment Vessel of Reactor 2 to see the inside. TEPCO's spokesman Matsumoto said in the press conference that the white specs in the video is from gamma rays. White streaks across the screen are water droplets.

The endoscope is made by Olympus. Drilling the hole on the Containment Vessel was done on January 17, requiring 40 workers in 10 teams. The endoscopy operation on January 19 took 34 workers, one hour, working right next to the Containment Vessel.

For more about this operation, please see my posts,
http://bit.ly/xQC8Eo
http://bit.ly/zeAG56


For more Fukushima I Nuke Plant accident and radiation contamination in Japan, visit my blogs:
www.exskf.com (English)
www.exskf-jp.com (Japanese)

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (arevamirpal)

  • Colin Krumblez

    I have been reading on a popular energy website that the very drilling of this 'hole' for said endoscope has now created more problems with temperature fluctuations, is this true, and why would this happen.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Colin Krumblez's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Colin Krumblez's comment.
  • arevamirpal

    Temperature fluctuation started to happen in early February, before the hole was drilled for the endoscope.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate arevamirpal's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate arevamirpal's comment.
    in reply to Colin Krumblez (Show the comment)

Top Comments

  • patton303

    If you watch any video of the Chernobyl disaster, the same thing happens. It's gamma rays overtaking and distorting the optics and also the metering sensors.

    · 16

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate patton303's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate patton303's comment.
  • historytruthseeker

    We have 500 more nuclear power plants. in the world. a couple more plants meltdown and the world is done. Then the rich might have to kill 6.5 billion instead of 6 billion. The oceans are polluted and it's all they can do producing seafood on land to keep up with demand.

    · 8

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate historytruthseeker's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate historytruthseeker's comment.

All Comments (164)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Michael Beason

    This is what it must have looked like thru the eyes of Spock in Star Trek 2: The wrath of Khan.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Beason's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Beason's comment.
  • HergotH01

    More funny is that this amount of flashes is not real ammount of "gamma". There was gillion times more gamma than that. What we see are lucky chunks of photons that interfered due to the high doses even with sensor desighned for different "light".

    If it would be ANALOG film, and higher doses, we would see unusuall "brightness" on it, just as sometimes happned in chernobyl (with most brightness coming from irradiated ground).

    If it would be super deadly dose, even your naked eye would see that.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate HergotH01's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate HergotH01's comment.
    in reply to HergotH01 (Show the comment)
  • HergotH01

    Ok, -finally-, about that red, blue, green, and white "noise" or "spark" flashes, occuring quickly.

    In camera sensor, there are pixels, as many as is its resolution. Those are made of subpixels, each detecting red, green, or blue color. Combination of those subpixels (and their intensity) give final pixel.

    Gamma, (unlike other radiation) - is on same principle as visible light, in extremely high concentration may variously overload subpixels, resulting in "fake" flashes of different colors.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate HergotH01's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate HergotH01's comment.
  • contakanta

    thats fake i think eing that closewill cause u afast death

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate contakanta's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate contakanta's comment.
  • Jonathan Calmett

    Ah man i'm getting cancer just looking at this video

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jonathan Calmett's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jonathan Calmett's comment.
  • foxfox99112

    just about to say that haha

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate foxfox99112's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate foxfox99112's comment.
    in reply to patton303 (Show the comment)
  • patton303

    Neato....

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate patton303's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate patton303's comment.
    in reply to David Mattern (Show the comment)
  • David Mattern

    Also notice how all of the flashes are either red, green, or blue (RGB).  This is due to sensor design limitations where specific sensor elements are filtered against 2 of the 3 colors and assigned a color. These subatomic particles are striking sensor elements without also striking adjacent elements for the other colors, resulting in color flashes of RGB.

    · 2

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate David Mattern's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate David Mattern's comment.
    in reply to David Mattern (Show the comment)
  • David Mattern

    Not so much overtaking and distorting the optics as registering directly on the CMOS or CCD sensor. Radiation was first discovered by its effects upon photographic film without involving exposure to light.

    · 2

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate David Mattern's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate David Mattern's comment.
    in reply to patton303 (Show the comment)
  • MrRepentwhor3

    Shoryuken!!!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrRepentwhor3's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrRepentwhor3's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later