Nuclear Weapons = Peace? (George Galloway)
Top Comments
All Comments (26)
-
The caller is an idiot, how stupid must you be to think that the only purpose nuclear fission serves is too build nuclear wepons.
-
Galloway is wrong, if Pakistan had no nukes, u s would have invaded them by now, but they know pak will nuke them if over pressured, so nukes as a deterrent is definitely right and a good shield.
-
This caller is such an idiot. All he seems to care about is the fact that Iran has 'nuclear capability'. He is a complete idiot and a typical red top reading xenophobe.
-
"If everyone got rid of nuclear weapons..."
Slightly different line from what CND et al. argued in the 1970s and 1980s. Remember? Pressure the NATO nuclear powers to disarm, and at the same time, completely ignore the Soviet Union's stockpiles.
-
thick people like dat guy should b lined up and shot.......thick motherfucker
-
Galloway wins again.
This caller was a complete idiot.
-
I think the caller has a point although isn't able to present it well. Clearly there hasn't been world peace since the invention of nuclear weapons but there hasn't been any mass invastions like there has been throughout history. I think its less likely that another Hitler will try to conquer the world. Without guns its far easier for gangs to pillage villages like they did in medievil times.
-
This is an extremely bizarre argument
-
Big George doesn't tolerate any fucking nonsense from arseholes like this caller, well done George, yer still the man!
Wow. I am very proud of Galloway. Nice clip. Thank you.
ItzMeRon 2 years ago 8
that was really ironic at the end, that bloke totally thought hed outsmarted him somehow whereas ol'galloway was pointing out a glaring inconsistency in the guy's argument
nameshaveallbeenused 2 years ago 8