@nnjhansen War? With whom? The "Terrorists" As far as I can tell, there is no clear definition for that term. The informal definitionss have the nasty characteristic of including many of our "friends." Will we be labelling people "extremists" next and imprisoning them without trials? How about "fabian socialists"? Or maybe "birther"?
@MickeyYahoo Do you not believe we are at war? The intent of the framers of the Constitution was very clear, the political branches fight our wars and the courts play no role.
Ms Liz Cheeny - do you think terrorism is NOT a crime? Shame on you, Bill Kristol. The intent of the framers of the constitution was VERY clear and both of you know that. Trashing our constitution is not "Keeping America Safe,"
"not sure the evidence will hold up to convict..."
Well then maybe they shouldn't be convicted in a military tribunal, either, ya moron!
Liz Cheney is afraid that defendants may be guilty or innocent will have a "public platform" where they can exercise free speech.
We should start learning from history and stop running from our values enough to give these defendants fair trials. If we value our institutions, then we should be confident that all guilty defendants will be convicted.
Lizzie is just looking to protect her Daddy. God forbid the public were made aware of all the prisoners that were tortured to death. Prisoners that weren't even charged with a crime. This is what happens when you pay a bunch of Desert-Rat Mercs to find terrorists - they bring ya innocent farmers and family men you can't charge. I guess that's why the Cheney gang threw those rights out the window too. No charge! No trial! Just kill them in your Kangaroo court, right Liz? Hide it from the public.
I believe he did. Even if he didn't, that's what I got from his messages. And when I tried to correct him by saying he wasn't, he said I was wrong about that, many times in fact. 90% of the messages we've exchanged were in contention of that very issue. YET... according to you, I'm the one in error here.
Look, I am not going to get into discussing this with you BUT:
He never said that Cheney was Ceo of Haliburton and VP at the same time. Why the hell are you saying that he said that. He was totally unambiguous about the timeline-REPEATEDLY. READ and try to understand what he actually said instead of assuming HE is the stupid one.
Hum like dad like daughter. King and queen of warmongering
USASalim 1 year ago
@MickeyYahoo The respective authorizations for the use of force passed by Congress lay out who we are at war with. If you are unclear, read them.
nnjhansen 1 year ago
@nnjhansen War? With whom? The "Terrorists" As far as I can tell, there is no clear definition for that term. The informal definitionss have the nasty characteristic of including many of our "friends." Will we be labelling people "extremists" next and imprisoning them without trials? How about "fabian socialists"? Or maybe "birther"?
MickeyYahoo 1 year ago
@MickeyYahoo Do you not believe we are at war? The intent of the framers of the Constitution was very clear, the political branches fight our wars and the courts play no role.
nnjhansen 1 year ago
Ms Liz Cheeny - do you think terrorism is NOT a crime? Shame on you, Bill Kristol. The intent of the framers of the constitution was VERY clear and both of you know that. Trashing our constitution is not "Keeping America Safe,"
MickeyYahoo 1 year ago
"not sure the evidence will hold up to convict..."
Well then maybe they shouldn't be convicted in a military tribunal, either, ya moron!
Liz Cheney is afraid that defendants may be guilty or innocent will have a "public platform" where they can exercise free speech.
We should start learning from history and stop running from our values enough to give these defendants fair trials. If we value our institutions, then we should be confident that all guilty defendants will be convicted.
theCamelCase 2 years ago
Lizzie is just looking to protect her Daddy. God forbid the public were made aware of all the prisoners that were tortured to death. Prisoners that weren't even charged with a crime. This is what happens when you pay a bunch of Desert-Rat Mercs to find terrorists - they bring ya innocent farmers and family men you can't charge. I guess that's why the Cheney gang threw those rights out the window too. No charge! No trial! Just kill them in your Kangaroo court, right Liz? Hide it from the public.
HemiHead66 2 years ago 2
I believe he did. Even if he didn't, that's what I got from his messages. And when I tried to correct him by saying he wasn't, he said I was wrong about that, many times in fact. 90% of the messages we've exchanged were in contention of that very issue. YET... according to you, I'm the one in error here.
NoGuff 2 years ago
@ NoGuff:
Look, I am not going to get into discussing this with you BUT:
He never said that Cheney was Ceo of Haliburton and VP at the same time. Why the hell are you saying that he said that. He was totally unambiguous about the timeline-REPEATEDLY. READ and try to understand what he actually said instead of assuming HE is the stupid one.
youcrackpot 2 years ago
I only comment to remind ppl....that this was talked about not long ago.
chich234 2 years ago