2007 Volvo XC90 2.5T 10 sec 0-100 km/h 0-60 mph

Volvo XC90, manufactured in 2007
2.5T - automatic
air conditioner is off

10 sec.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• 0-100
• km/h
• acceleration
• speed
• 0-60
• volvo
• XC90
• 2.5T

[godzillat6]

I rather have this to the T6. Peek torque ie. 320Nm @ 1600 rpm and a more gears, 5 spd auto instead of 4.

Off course there are 3.2 I6 and 4.4 V8 but if I had a choice of 2.5T and T6, definitely the light pressure turbo cause there's not much difference in acceleration 0 - 100 Km/h. The 4 Spd auto in the T6 is waaay too tall!!

[inf0rmale]

I heard the gearboxes on T6s is weak and breaks a lot. And yep, 4 gears auto is absolutely out of date.

[perfoodleschnitz]

It's a 5-cylinder turbo.

[Powerstrokekid1]

need the v8

[imandanmarki]

toooooooo slow for 2.5t v5

[RiiDDiiM]

@godzillat6 Fair enough you have two thumbs up from other YouTube users, but you're talking complete and utter shite. The best engine suited to the Volvo XC90 is the 2.4 litre engine diesel, torque is what matters with such a weighty vehicle.

[losercust]

wow, that is slow.  seriously, my 2000 voyager with 200,000 miles is just as fast

[volvo23t]

eventually i am going to make an acceleration video of my 2001 volvo v70 2.4T

[jeep4jeep]

@volvo23t

4 inches of snow this morning - no chance of a slalom sprint but I'm of out to play in the Oo|||||||oO

[volvo23t]

nice :) i would like to see it

[jeep4jeep]

@volvo23t

It was better than I expected :)

I will post a 0-60 mph at some point

[volvo23t]

thats quite impressive

[jeep4jeep]

@volvo23t

Mine is a 3.0 Diesel, 376ft. lbs of torque 1600-3900rpm (redline 4500), and 218hp. 0-62mph = 9 seconds! STOCK...and its automatic.

[jeep4jeep]

100 what??? Thats 100 km/h which is 60 mph. 

My Jeep is diesel and hits 60 mph in under 9 seconds!!! and its bigger and heavier!!

I thought this T5 engine is supposed to have some guts!

[Bae88]

yeah youre right, but that was the old T6 - the new T6 is based in the SI6 3.2 and shares the same 6-speed gearbox as the diesel and the V8 as well

[Phantomik007]

есть! :)

[ptowntexas]

now its the 3.2 in the us

[ihatetrends]

yeah my bad. haha

[ihatetrends]

I'm not bashing the speed, cause I like volvos.

But what were they thinking putting a 4cyl in a 4500lb suv?

[shawtiee1085]

not the hybrid. its very quick. check my channel; the video is called toyota camry top speed

[volvo23t]

It has 236ft. lbs. of torque at 1500-4500rpm, so in normal driving, it feels like it has a large V6 or a small V8. Also, the ECU can be upgraded on the 2.5T, along with an exhaust system, it will produce 245hp and 275ft. lbs. torque, then you can add a K&N cold air intake for another 15 or so odd horsepower and about the same amount of torque. The new 4 cylinder Toyota Camrys aren't very slow, they do 0-60 in 8.7 seconds, when you think about the fact that they were designed for "aging" drivers.

[shawtiee1085]

this has no performance. its slower than a four-cylinder toyota camry.

[ThePaperBoy21858]

exactly what shawtiee1085 said!

[ThePaperBoy21858]

u must be a senior to think THAT actually sounded and accelerated good!

[volvo23t]

I have driven Volvos with both engines, and I would choose the 2.5T for fuel economy, performance, and the fact that they are easier to tune than the 3.2 because of the turbo.