Stoneridge v. Scientific-Atlanta

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
542 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 16, 2008

The United States Supreme Court has further limited the rights of investors who have lost money because of fraud.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • From what I understand, Central Bank was a cry from the court encouraging congress to codify implied third party or scheme liability. Congress recognized this, and created section 104 of PSLRA of 1995. Clearly, if Congress had intended that scheme liability was to have the same bite as violations of 10(b) or 10b-5, it would have done so. Instead, it created a specific statute for aiding and abetting. While I wish that Congress would review that statute, I think this was the right decision.

  • nicely done.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more