Intelligent Designer or Cosmic Accident

http://www.focuspress.org Join Dr. Brad Harrub in the series Convicted on whether the world came about by an intelligent designer or cosmic accident.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• intelligent
• designer
• cosmic
• accident
• athiesm
• creationism
• evolution
• dr.
• brad
• harub
• focus
• press
• convicted
• design
• chance
• truth
• apologetics
• Darwin

[GodKillerAtheist]

@TChapman500 Abiogenesis shot down HAHA Tell me more funny man! I can sense the Derp is strong in you also! =D

[GodKillerAtheist]

@TChapman500 CreationDoTcom is a pedophile site you'll catch a virus and the police will watch you..man you're trying to get people arrested!

[GodKillerAtheist]

I love how this guy oversimplifies evolution almost to a state of retardation. What does evolution have to do with where we go when we die? Seriously you people are stupid as dirt. Evolution is a process of adaptation. The Herp dee Derp is strong in this one!

[ttllyprocrastinator]

Proud to be the lucky mistake of brainless morons!! :D

[siddhpith]

Ancient Indian book Bhagvat all these had expressed by Auther Ved Vyas.

[nanaforiod]

@TChapman500 Actually, read the description. This is not the same as the video that was debunked.

potholer54 says:

I've used the example of the greenish warbler, after someone pointed out that the ensatina is not the best example of a ring species. Hybrids of the two end-species in the ensatina ring exist in two locations, whereas there are no hybrids from the two end-species descended from the greenish warbler.

[nanaforiod]

@TChapman500 Evolution doesn't say anything about how life arose/began; Evolution only says that life can evolve over generations into new life and vastly different forms due to Environmental Pressures accompanied by:

Natural variation within species

Natural Selection

Hereditary traits

and even random mutation.

Nowhere is it even implied in Evolution that life can form from non-life. They are separate theories.

Frankly I doubt creation(dot)com is the best source for scientific research...

[nanaforiod]

@TChapman500 Explain. Explain how one theory depends on the other.

[TChapman500]

@nanaforiod Also, even though you claim abiogenesis is not evolution, if abiogenesis is shot down (which it has been), evolution goes down with it.

[TChapman500]

@nanaforiod They both say life comes from non-life, so they're treated as the same thing. It was shot down when it was shown that not even microscopic life can form on non-living organic matter. Because it can't form from non-living organic matter, it doesn't form from non-organic matter.

Do a search on [creation(.)com/] for "abiogenesis" and the first two results have the majority of the evidence against abiogenesis.