Tip-toe through the Tapeats with Wazooloo

http://wazooloo.com
http://genesisweek.com
http://ianjuby.org
A brief response to accusations of "Lying" and "Deceitfulness" that have been hurled at me on Youtube.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• tapeats
• sandstone
• fossil
• footprints
• creation
• science
• Ian
• Juby
• complete
• evolution
• 777quip
• darwin
• creationism
• grand
• canyon
• Charles Darwin
• Park
• funny
• wazooloo
• paleontology

[lawilson200]

Nice try, but I recognize just how active an immagination you have. But talk about making a mountain out of a mole hill.

The real problem you face is fitting this alleged site into your little fantasy world. You claim Tapeats was laid down under mudflows traveling at 90 mph. When challenged, you claimed the flood had high and low tides (even though this is not supported by the Genesis account). 90 mph is enough to destroy any creature. They certainly would not leave footprints. Try again

[wazooloo]

...and when the mud flow stops, how fast is it moving? I believe these tracks were made by amphibians, who can survive even in fast-moving water.

No, the real problem (which you keep dodging) is trying to explain fossil footprints in rocks "so old" within an evolutionary framework - a question you keep dodging. Now you want to suggest they're carved? Like I didn't see that one coming...

[akg41470]

Wow. Gee. Sure looks like an unmistakably human footprint to me. Couldn't POSSIBLY have been any other kind of land-dwelling animal?

Pfft.

[wazooloo]

Uh. Gee - I didn't say it was a human track.  I said it was remarkably like the Coconino fossil footprints, which are either a lizard or amphibian footprint.

[lawilson200]

You first need to establish that these are footprints and you have not done this yet. There is no "dodging" when you have not yet shown facts in evidence.

As for your mudflow analysis, this is simply ludricrous. Tapeats has many fossilized species of trillobites, mullosks, brachiopods and other shellies. There are also burrowing tracks. None of these would survive in tack, in a 90 mph mudflow. Care to provide a modern example? How about Nevada Del Ruiz? Mount St Helens?

[lawilson200]

You claimed that once this alleged mudflow (forming the Tapeats deposits), the area became dry long enough for survivors to leave footprints.

Using the model set by Austin and others, Tapeats was form during the intial phase of the bible flood. And according to the dating matrix developed by your side, God did not stop the flood waters from rising until 150 days into the flood.

So, how could you have exposed land so soon into the flood, for any animals to be left to take a walk?

[richi1173]

To the guy who made this video: lobopods man, lobopods.

[richi1173]

Wheres the citation that they where actually footprints?

[oneday13]

wow sir wazooloo this video is awesome!

and all your other videos are so fun to

watch that i eat my meal in front of the

computers just to complete your series of

complete creation!!! Your videos totally

knocks down the religion of evolutionism.

[theTRUTHgroup]

Great job, buddy.

I love that you are ACTUALLY in the field doing real research for us 'wacky' Creationists.

Keep up the good work.

I hope to one day get out in the field with you.

I'd like to BE THERE personally, instead of just talking about these things.

Well done.

[ozredneck22]

What, no talking, but this Youtube with sound! I get it, let the evidence speak for itself and I tell you the sound IS DEAFENING. great work!

[paulhumber]

Good job!

[lawilson200]

Chadwick has argued that Tapeats was formed by turbidity currents.

However, TC deposits leave distinctive charateristics (Bourma sequences). The fact is, there is no comparison between Tapeats and evidence of turbidity currents (or other examples of sediment gravity flow), which is why Chadwick's claim never made peer review, nor was it ever accepted.

You cannot look at Tapeates in a vaccum. This is why Bright Angel and Muav are apart of the same sequence.

[Science4God]

When we are talking about mudflows, or sandflows in this case, we are talking about Turbidity Currents (or Traction Currents). The Tapeats was NOT a single flow, but a series of flows. They hug the bottom of the ocean floor when they occur today. All a creature has to do is NOT be directly in the bottom portion of the water where the flow is actually occuring. NO PROBLEM!

[lawilson200]

A lense cover would work. A ruler is preferred. But railing in the distance does not work. Any photographer would tell you that.