Head is blurred out,with all these supposed big cats theres always something,either the footage is unfocused,or the camera bobs around like the footage is being shot on a roller-coaster,if there really were these big cats the footage would be as smooth and pristine as leopard wildlife footage in africa or tiger footage in india,these big cats are fakes,thats it.
My mates brother seen the original photo of this cat and it's just a ferral cat, the head was blurred out because the cat had a white blaze down it's nose. The cat was hanging a lot closer to the camera and the guy and the bike were set further back making the cat look a lot bigger than it actually is. It was just a scam to make money from the TV and newspapers.
absolute crock if you ask me. If he has been a shooter/hunter of 50 years then you would definatly know the signifigance of shooting a so called bigcat and would be keeping the whole thing not making up bull story about feeding the remains to eels in a pond or whetever it was
Looks like a load of shit to me! If you shot something like that you'd definitely keep the whole skin. What's with the tv station blocking out the face of it in the picture? another reason why I doubt it.
Head is blurred out,with all these supposed big cats theres always something,either the footage is unfocused,or the camera bobs around like the footage is being shot on a roller-coaster,if there really were these big cats the footage would be as smooth and pristine as leopard wildlife footage in africa or tiger footage in india,these big cats are fakes,thats it.
Chiptsaorocks 2 weeks ago
@etard82 yes...yes they did
aussasman97 9 months ago in playlist big cats
My mates brother seen the original photo of this cat and it's just a ferral cat, the head was blurred out because the cat had a white blaze down it's nose. The cat was hanging a lot closer to the camera and the guy and the bike were set further back making the cat look a lot bigger than it actually is. It was just a scam to make money from the TV and newspapers.
stagstalker13 1 year ago
....did they blur out the head of the cat?
etard82 1 year ago
I have to agree with bimborocks & moncheej1974,,,,
Why would you only Keep ONLY the tail and feed the remains to the eels ??????????
MZ1428 2 years ago
DNA tests showed it was a common house cat. A very big feral one at that. Officially the biggest on record.
coaldusty 2 years ago
No idea, but from this video, it could also be a dog because I can't see much.
inotaishu1 2 years ago
absolute crock if you ask me. If he has been a shooter/hunter of 50 years then you would definatly know the signifigance of shooting a so called bigcat and would be keeping the whole thing not making up bull story about feeding the remains to eels in a pond or whetever it was
bimborocks 2 years ago 2
Looks like a load of shit to me! If you shot something like that you'd definitely keep the whole skin. What's with the tv station blocking out the face of it in the picture? another reason why I doubt it.
moncheej1974 2 years ago 2
This guy was a total fraud that i exposed.A total shit head.
mjmoss66 2 years ago