Luskin vs Q-Dragon

a little phone call...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• creation
• evolution
• luskin
• cassey
• intelligent
• design
• discovery
• institute
• false
• dmca
• donexodus2
• call
• phone

[CENSOREDFORSEX]

Are you Stephen Hawkings kid?

Great vid, 5 stars.

[AnimalNitrates]

When your argument is destroyed by a teenager, you need to reconsider.

5 stars, this is brilliant :D

[subductionzone]

I know that the laws on recording telephone calls vary from state to state. In Washington state, where the Discovery Institute is based and where I live Q-Dragon's activity would have been illegal. But that may not be the case in other states. Since this video is still up on this site that seems to indicate that it may be legal for Q-Dragon to record it where he lives. I remember this argument when the Monica Lewinski scandal occurred. Her recorded conversations were legal where done.

[krankenshaft]

Yes hello?

[GodsArePeopleToo]

lmao he was pissing his pants once he realized he was being recorded

[BadLilNinja]

Got to love this guy!

[Vberg56]

nicely done Qman :P

[judomuerte]

False premise, brilliant.

[ReddmanDGZ]

Wow, listen to that worm squirm...

[evensgrey]

@gorilla199uncensored All right, so we know you don't care what the law says, and you don't care that the liar Luskin was entirely wrong when he pretended Q-Dragon might have broken it. At least now I know you're completely unwilling to deal with reality and I don't need to demonstrate that you're wrong any further, since you've declared a total disinterest in reality.

[gorilla199uncensored]

@evensgrey

"READ IT "

"Where a private communication is originated BY MORE THAN one person"

"or is intended by the originator thereof to be received BY MORE THAN one person "

Quotes from what you supplied.

I know its hard for you but they each are only one person and no other person was involved in the phone call.

"Q-Dragon cannot be pretended to NOT be an originator of a phone call "

The ref you provided makes no mention of originators rights to record.

[evensgrey]

@gorilla199uncensored Perhaps you should actually READ IT instead of desperately trying to find a way to weasel out of the applicable law.

Even if you discount the fact that ALL parties to a phone call are originators of the call, Q-Dragon cannot be pretended to NOT be an originator of a phone call that he PLACED. It also makes no mention of what party is given permission to intercept (which actually means record), only who is able to give it.