Evidence of Molten Metal at World Trade Center

NIST (National Institute of Standards & Technology) would have us believe there was no evidence of molten metal at the World Trade Center on and after 9/11. This is a clip from 'Blueprint for Truth' 2008 edition which clearly shows that NIST may have overlooked some crucial evidence. 'Blueprint for Truth' produced by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. AE911truth.org.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• world
• trade
• center
• wtc
• molten
• metal
• steel
• evidence
• World
• Trade
• Center
• Richard
• Gage
• WTC
• WTC7
• 911
• Blueprint
• for
• truth
• firemen
• testimony
• inside
• job
• steven
• jones
• NIST
• NWO
• New
• order
• architect
• engineer

[mooners40]

@JLaw012 and fusing of concrete and steel requires temperatures far greater than those a max temp office fire can reach (1000 c ) - so it is therefore impossible for the official story of 9/11 to be true - an office fire cannot just conjure up 500c more heat - it's physically impossible and therefore proof that something else was at work - and considering nist refused to test for anything what does it mean to you?

[mooners40]

@JLaw012 it's impossible for a 47 storey building to free-fall thru itself for 105 feet - newton's third law precludes it - when an object falls and it collides with other objects , they slow down - they react - an equal and opposite reaction - wtc7 was in free-fall for 2.25 seconds defying the laws of physics - free-fall means zero resistance from the structure - zero - meaning nothing collided - this is impossible without controlled demolition

[yearginclarke]

I remember watching the news after 9/11 and seeing evidence of the high temperatures of the rubble live on TV, and whether or not the steel was molten, the prolonged heat in the rubble was CERTAINLY fishy. So if it wasn't thermite/thermate providing a consistent heat source, WTF CAUSED IT? Certainly wasn't the by-product of a gravity collapse. Ever given much thought to realizing that the government/military isn't going to tell the public all the technologies they have, and could use?

[JLaw012]

@nk3007, Let be clear about something for one thing there is not overwhelming evidence of molten steel, secondly and most importantly the allegations of molten steel being found days or weeks later only would prove it is NOT thermite or demolitions, why? Because thermite is a fast burning incendiary and demolitions explode not melt, the only thing that would be able to keep metal in a molten state would have to be a consistent heat source and no type of thermite or demolition does that.

[nk3007]

@JLaw012 Ya... all well and good, but the point I was trying to make is that there is overwhelming evidence of molten steel and temperatures greatly exceeding anything explainable given the parameters of the official explanation. What caused structural steel to MELT (not weaken, but actually become liquid) in the WTC buildings? According to your own numbers it would take 1525 celsius. What in the world could have burned that hot?

[JLaw012]

@nk3007 steel melts at 1525° C, and although jet fuel burns only at 825° C, it doesn't have to burn hot enough to melt to cause the buildings to collapse, since steel loses 50% of its strength at 648 ° C

[JLaw012]

@nk3007,cond. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79. This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.

The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building's east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures.

[JLaw012]

@nk3007, heat from the uncontrolled fires caused thermal expansion of the steel beams on the lower floors of the east side of WTC 7, damaging the floor framing on multiple floors.

a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building. The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor.

[nk3007]

@usamericanz What in the World Trade Centers burned hot enough to melt the steel? That's the key element for people with brain stems.

[nk3007]

@JLaw012 What material or circumstance, within the parameters of the official explanation, would allow for temperatures anywhere near those found at the WTC site? What was burning, or could have been burned that could melt steel? I don't expect a logical answer from you, given that you actually believe WTC 7 collapsed upon itself at free fall speed from the failure of a single column.