The Real Cleopatra

Religious rituals carried Cleopatra's message, "I am a deity, Caesar is a deity, and our child is the product of a divine union."

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Ancient World
• the real cleopatra
• egypt unwrapped
• ceasar
• cesarion
• gods
• national geographic

[StarQualityWins]

@nixter888 I'm not wrong. My information is correct. But distortion is a crime; History has been notoriously distorted. Watch "Carmensita" by Devandra Barnhart, here on YouTube. It's an ode to Bollywood comedy, about Alexander's ancestor in India. The evil tyrant is defeated, and a Democratic Republic is under way. The Prince of Hraminah leaves his soul-mate for a new woman. Carmensita, although heartbroken, remains in the Kingdom to help. Thus Vaishali 600 B.C.E, a Democratic Republic results.

[StarQualityWins]

@nixter888 Alexander's bloodline passed through Egypt prior to 600B.C. There is important history there but not what you're saying. Egypt had been almost continuosly held down by the same family for over 1000 years and was the hub of civilization. It was solid and did not have trouble until it lost a War to a Southern African Nation 2000 years ago. Cleopatra wanted to implement Democracy in Egypt, as Rome, Greece, and a Republic in India all had Democracies at that time. Alexander is not Egypt.

[YvnesLemrac]

It's complicated.

[EgyptianWereNotBlack]

WE EGYPTIAN WERE NOT AFRICANS WE CAN'T SPEAK EVEN AFRICANS

[mccinable25]

She was black! deal with it!

[ThePlatypusinc]

@StarQualityWins Quick comment. If what you say is true, about the 50%, then wouldnt that make your argument a complete bogus and bologna tale? I mean that your story has never shown in any of my research. Also i do believe that Roman reports and historical evedence points in favor of the most adopted version of the event. How can you also prove that the Indians were related to Alexander? You do realize propaganda of that sort acts only in favor of the person that makes it.

[ThePlatypusinc]

I am not sure what people are going on about with Indian descent and other things. According to everything i have ever read, Cleopatra was a Greek/Macedonian. Alexander was the same. The reason for Alexanders desire for conquering India was for conquest. If Marc Antony had lost to some African Dynasty why had he fought in Actium? And also why had the Roman empire entered Egypt and claim it if the Egyptians lost to some other Dynasty. A lot of peoples points dont concide with known history.

[policeman7093]

SS

[oriocoookie]

@Finkelgruber if you follow the gene mutation one finds that we all came from africa .... the first humans out of africa turned east and that is starq argument ... of course oone can say that we all come from amoebas and hence we all hail from an amoeba kingdom in primordial sea ... :P ... alexander was greek spoke greek and strove all his life (and his father beofre as well) to prove hat he was more greek thatn greeks

[Finkelgruber]

@StarQualityWins

I asked you for proof of your incredibly silly comments and assertions about Alexander's and Cleopatra's blood-line roots, but none are comming.

As of now I will no longer reply to your exceedingly limited knowledge of history.

[Finkelgruber]

@Siristaromen

NOT italian GREEK !

[StarQualityWins]

@Finkelgruber The reason for Alexander's vested interest in India was because of his ancestors. He began a democratic republic in Greece, his ancestor had begun a democratic republic in Vishali, India. That idea was in his family, the 2 republics are that way related. God doesn't write history books. Anyone with a PHD can get a book published. It doesn't ordain the contents as truth. Researchers base 50% of their findings on theories. History is notorious for inaccuracy and misinterpretation.