Coleman at International Conference on Climate Change
Uploader Comments (TheAutoChannel)
All Comments (7)
-
The only character assassination going on is your impuning of Coleman's credentials. Coleman simply provides background on a guy who reversed his opinion. That is not character assassination.
-
@TheKickerboy99 Didn't the US Supreme Court have to rule on a case in 2007 that CO2 is a pollutant? Yes, they did. That means the EPA has to respond as the responsible government agency. Coleman admits in this video he is not a research scientist. He is talking about a subject he has only a peripheral knowledge. Then, he goes on to character assassinate Dr. Revelle with hearsay.
Coleman never made even meteorology a subject of study in college. And he spent his singing lesson money on booze.
-
@TRUMPHENT the jig is up for the co2 tax. lets concentrate on real threats like dumping garbage in the oceans and true polutants, not co2.
If the Supreme Court says that CO2 is a pollutant then it is! --- right?
pkpapers 5 months ago
@pkpapers
Yes, and I hope you're doing your civic duty by no exhaling.
TheAutoChannel 5 months ago
Bjorn Lomborg has stepped back due to the overwhelming evidence that he was opposing.
Gotta luv Hearlland Institute. A brother to the CEI, it touts a nonscientist teleprompt reader, John Coleman of no virtue.
He came out of the closet? What connotations does that carry? Coleman can't carry a tune and can't understand a scientific concept.
TRUMPHENT 2 years ago
When you have someone who has spent 50 years in the daily study and hands-on application of a specific field, that person is as expert as it gets. To think or say anything different is laughable.
TheAutoChannel 2 years ago