Intelligent Design vs Evolution P2

Intelligent Design vs Evolution Part two

Category:

Education

Tags:

• intelligent
• design
• ID
• evolution
• Darwin
• Dawkins
• creation
• creationism
• part
• two

[TCupUK]

Looks like the evolutionist are backed up in the corner and franticly trying to keep life in this dying idea. Lets talk cell biology rather than fossils :p.

[faithisfiction]

The ignorance about the definition of a "scientific theory" makes my nose bleed.

Honestly, if you dont know what you're talking about, keep your mouth shut and save all the sensible people a headache.

[gregrutz]

@TCupUK It does not matter what ERV do, they are used as markes. The markers and the code itself would not be the way it is unless evolution happens.

[gregrutz]

@TCupUK Can't explain those pesky fossils, can you? That is one of the things the theory explains.

And one of the things that prove creationism wrong.

[papinbala]

THIS DOCUMENTARY IS BIASED

[Ko252]

@TCupUK Question you put about whales? You only said that the evolution of whales was debunked, without answer my question regarding this supposedly debunking. Regarding primordial soup? Didnt you even read the link from Nature I referred to?

Warming up? Ha! And the test is; 1) MDR bacterias, which are not all based on horizontal gene transfer. 2) development of our spesific part of immune system etc. Why didnt you try to answer any of qustion, for a bit?

[TCupUK]

Are you really not going to answer any of the questions I put forward about whales, and primordial soup?

Damn I was only just warming up on the topic.

I still want to know what this test is that occurs everyday and proves evolution!

[TCupUK]

"A retrovirus in human DNA may be responsible for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and multiple sclerosis. This retrovirus is only "set off" if the person carrying it is infected with influenza or toxoplasmosis either in the womb or very early in life, otherwise it remains dormant. The retrovirus is thought to have infected a primate ancestor of all humans and monkeys about 55-60 million years ago."

You telling me our common ancestor was schizophrenic?

I am pretty sure humans where not around.

[TCupUK]

@Ko252 Funny you should bring up the immune system. Can you explain to me why we have retrovirus laying dormant in our DNA, for sometimes millions of years. To all of a sudden arise from the ashes as such like a phoenix. Ironically there is an experiment under this very name. They do not come back as new viruses, but a re-emergence of what they once where.

"The paper also hints at unknown ancient transmissions of viruses between hosts."

Source = Nature.com

EBLN-1 is 50 mil old and is intact :p

[Ko252]

@TCupUK Far from. it fits perfectly. Our immun system can evolve, as you yourself pointed out, an ability deeply based on the principles of hypermutation, and they dont even use horizontal gene transfer. Horizontal gene transfer isnt the only way of to transfer genes, and I would recommend you to read about the subject. As I said before; you have yet to put something on the table, of any value.

[TCupUK]

@TCupUK Forget to mention, You know Pakicetus was found in Pakistan and Basilosaurus was found in Louisiana, but I suppose geography is not an issue?