HARDtalk Wikipedia part 1
Loading...
Loading...
2,052
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 1:37Girl found dead in lorryby bbcworldnews17,183 views
- 3:11Straw dismisses bomber 'deal' claimby bbcworldnews1,322 views
- 2:06Police search Jaycee neighbour's houseby bbcworldnews1,903 views
- 2:03Police to wrap up Dugard searchby bbcworldnews2,190 views
- 7:46Tori Amos - BBC HARDtalk (02-June-2009) Part 3 ...by digitalghost897,315 views
- 9:35Hugh Laurie on Hardtalk (Part 1)by u2fan1537,969 views
- 2:43An embarrassed Fox News hits Wikipediaby imnotmexican00130,850 views
- 10:58Latif Yahia interviewed by Stephen Sackur BBC H...by LatifYahiaChannel93,049 views
- 6:20Jimmy Walesby bambifrancisco3,160 views
- 9:51Radosław Sikorski in Hardtalk BBC-Polish foreig...by salekpalmarek75,558 views
- 3:29BBC News Hardtalk Jimmie Akesson Swedish i...by jojjema17,801 views
- 8:57BBC HardTalk Sri Lanka 9-9: Rehabilitation of F...by NoEalamInSL2,118 views
- 7:44Annie Lennox - HardTalk 2010 (part 1/3)by annielennoxontv21,025 views
- 5:51"NO GAYS" says Jamaica's primeminister on bbc's...by chunchunvenesha201,478 views
- 4:51HARDtalk Wikipedia part 2by bbcworldnews1,458 views
- 4:56HARDtalk Prince El Hassan 1by bbcworldnews7,612 views
- 3:14HARDtalk Dr Martin Seligman 2by bbcworldnews11,946 views
- 5:47HardTalk: Morgan Spurlock 2by bbcworldnews4,700 views
- 8:55HARDtalk: Charlton Heston 2by bbcworldnews5,775 views
- 23:33HARDtalk with Dr Imran Waheedby neocarvi52,967 views
Wikipedia sucks big time!!! Especially the articles regarding countries and history!
MrSeekerofjustice 4 months ago
@jkyet
Exactly! A majority of the history books in America are ridiculous!! I actually did some research on some of the books and it seems to me that an American's view of history is not even close to real history!!
agger12343 1 year ago
@agger12343 yeah he said "mostly" just like most of what you read in history books is true, mostly.
jkyet 1 year ago
LOL! "Mostly"... He says!
agger12343 1 year ago
well theres quite a distance between handfulls and completely (100%) false
whiteepiphone4 2 years ago
oi igotnoideawhattoput your an idiot. wikipedia is constantly scanned over and over again by volunteers who will pick out and fix any incorrect information on major articles. pages on wikipedia are often incorrect because they are about the things that don't matter. the major articles on say countries, capital cities or famous people are all therefore correct because of this.
GottaLoveSwifty 2 years ago
Q: Are what we reading on Wikipedia true?
A:Mostly, mostly true.
That answer was completely NOT true! There are handful of misinformation on Wikipedia.
igotnoideawhattoput 3 years ago
One star for exposing this moron a little, -4 stars for not pointing out the clear bias of Jimmy's pet evolutionist and atheist moderators.
kyleain 3 years ago
How about being passionate for the truth, and not passionate for an atheist propaganda tool that pretends anyone is allowed to make corrections to it, when that's clearly not true. Bother to study the evidence for once instead being dumber than an animal.
kyleain 3 years ago
It's good to see him answer some hard asked questions. I'm passionate about wikipedia, but it's a passion based on the potential of wikipedia not it's reality.
The reality is that wikipedia is imperfect for the same reasons Jimmy Wales gave, which is that even the most reliable entry is based on a source that can never be perfect. Any news organization or history is controlled by it's focus. Giving undue attention in one topic, but ignoring another, just as equally important.
Sparkygravity 4 years ago