What's in my pockets? What I carry EDC on my person.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
42,862
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 4, 2009

What I carry. Simple. Sorry for the crazy auto focus, it has just started to do that.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (206)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I like the self defence thing you have in the US, here in Norway it isnt allowed for free people to carry even a pocket knife in urban areas, But it is needed these days, becouse of the invasion from the arab world and africa.. making the criminal statistics to skyrocket...they are fucking up a fine nation..Im afraid europa will drown in blood once again. sorry my rusty English. Best wishes from Norway.

  • @tsetsoooo On reflection, I do have a civic duty. It is to point out, in as unequivical terms as possible, the poison of socialism. Socialism is exactly chaos, used to orchestrate the removal of freedom of choice from the individual.

    Socialism IS "the Man," masquerading as being for the common good.

    Individualism is good, all forms of involuntary collectivism, are bad. People who attempt to enforce it are doing evil.

    That is how I DARE to speak of socialism.

  • @tsetsoooo By the way, Lenin would have referred to your philosophy, as that of a "useful idiot."

    That of course was his term, not mine. I'd just say that you were confused.

  • @tsetsoooo I "dare" speak of socialism so, because I speak the truth. Socialism is political cancer. It's based on theft, in the name of "fairness." It is theft.

    I do not accept, "doctors, professors, and teachers," deciding what is good for me. That is part of what is wrong with socialism - others deciding for you. The closer that individual responsibility remains to the individual citizen, the more properous the society.

    The larger the government, the smaller the individual. Socialism kills.

  • @CharlesHeller How dare you speak of socialism in such a manner ?!?!? Have you no civic duty? Is your only wish choas and anarchy. Socialism was created for the GOOD for all HUMANKIND. By doctors , proffesors and teachers. By the people for the PEOPLE. Not by "The Man". The leaders of the states of Socialism exp. Stalin. They gave socialism a bad name by commiting acts of mass murder and by trampling on the basic rights of humans. It did some allfull things. I agree. But its PURPOSE is true.

  • @southarmaghtanker Anyone can get a gun in any country. England bans most guns. Do criminals have a hard time getting guns there?

    America is a leader because we do not generally punish the innocent for the acts of the guilty. That's why LAWFUL people here can own and carry guns.

    There are HUNDREDS of gun laws in theU.S., and crime is not that rampant. We have some bad neighborhoods, but the vast majority of the country is not plagued by crime.

    If you cannot own a gun, you are a subject.

  • @tsetsoooo Capitalism and socialism are attempting to be merged by Obama, and it is a disaster.

    Socialism is a sickness. Hopefully, with enough education and reading of history, it will be illiminated, and those that used to believe in it will wonder how they were ever duped into believing in it.

  • @cheesealtar There is O statistical evidence of ANY correlation betwn number of guns in a society, and its crime rate. On the other hand, John Lott's "More guns, Less Crime," uses empirical evidence to show that mass murders occur less frequently in places where civilians go armed.

    EVIDENCE: Switzerland and Israel. Huge percentage of gun ownership in both societies, and little crime.

    Conversely, England bans most handguns, and has a murder problem with guns.

    It''s not the guns.

  • @CharlesHeller are you retarded or justintentionally stupid because availability of guns is almost directly related to crime. also guns re an overkill weapon, why bring a sledehammer when a mallet will do? fucking retard americans.

  • @Bluetorchproductions There is nothing particularly extreme about a second gun, usually of a smaller size than the primary weapon, for CIVILIAN carry. There are many logical reasons for it. Need is not necessarily one of them.

    This has nothing to do with neighborhood, but preparedness mindset. It is also a good idea to have less lethal tools as well if you have room for them and can find intelligent ways to do so without hampering your lifestyle.

    There is NOTHING unusuall about semi-autos.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more