Kent Hovind vs Hugh Ross (part 6, disc 1 of 2)
Top Comments
All Comments (351)
-
Did he say evolution works ! [but only for bacteria]
-
@elijahoil Every think the 6 days story is wrong no matter how long you make each day?
-
Even another bible packer can prove Kent wrong. LOL
-
@dalerob66 Except the bible flood myth.
-
@spiritwarrior1 I am an atheist, and I have a lot of respect for Hugh Ross, he is a brilliant man, and Kent Hovind is a ignorant criminal, and that is all he is.
-
@rosebudmaster that is true.
-
I don't like how Ross interprets most of scripture litereally to an extreme, accept when it comes to the 6 days. His interpretation of the 6 days is an exegetical nightmare. Can you imagine Moses writing those verses and actually really meaning some long period of time, like millions and millions. teaching their Jewish kids "now remember, when I say day, I mean millions of years. don't forget that now..." Much respect to him, but I believe that many of his interpretations are very bias.
-
two idiots debating who's the biggest idiot...
-
Hugh Ross is not a a evolutionist but uses some teaching of it which means that he believes in it but wont admit that he is a evolutionist. He also teaches f thermodynamics diffrent than 99.9 percent of professor with a Dr degree in it.
Im with Hugh Ross 60 %
This is where Dr Ross shines. He proves here beyond a shadow of a doubt that God's word (the bible) and modern science make a great marriage, and are inseparable.
dalerob66 1 year ago 15
"I certainly resent my tax dollars going to support that."
Yes, Kent. We know.
ElasticGiraffe 6 months ago 4