Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Kennedy: A Legacy In Blood "The Shooting" Pt. 1 of 6

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,086
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 18, 2009

The shooting of JFK is examined part 1
Analysis of Kennedy Assasination A Film By Dean Mason
Original Music By Michael Mason

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (deanmasonone)

  • This is very compelling, and I appreciate the great work. As devil's advocate, I'd like to have a good argument on how so many involved people could keep a conspiracy going? Am I to assume that they were all killed?

  • @MrTonystar1 A very good question that I try to leave to the viewers to decide. Personally, I think when the govt. designs a plan that is meant to cover-up a "job", it's a harder nut to crack open because of "buffering" between operatives and planners. Overall knowledge isn't passed on. Each level is a single task. Which is of course the way organized crime protects itself. I think "elimination" is used to get rid of potential unforseen problems. (again organized crime set the standard)- Dean

  • Is it still a conspiracy theory that JFK was assassinated by those in positions of power and wealth? It's a given, that the persons responsible are known to those in power now, once they're all dead, it'll come out!! What's more important now, is those that were also affected, like the witnesses that disappeared, and their families that have no body to bury. Not to mention the families that "may" have been told secrets surrounding the event, whom are still watched and harassed to this very day.

  • @CorneliusRandom Hi I think colonel Fletcher Prouty said it best in the film, (paraphrase) "it's an amalgum of the wealthy and the govt. It's one thing to kill someone, but who else could operate a cover up ever after." The evidence that's been changed could not be changed by anyone except in the govt. The reason I think that the truth has still not been fully revealed is that the govt.'s participation is a threat to any current govt. in power. Because if we knew, we'd demand reform.-Dean

  • @deanmasonone Thanks for the reply!! Yeah, that's a really good point!! If we knew, perhaps our confidence in the Govt. would be utterly shattered. Although, should "absolute" power be given to one faction? Look what's possible when a few men have so much power. In theory, a handful of people could destroy the world several times over, and without even consulting the majority of people. Maybe we need reform, with or without the truth being known?!

see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Senator Yarborough was so good at lying.

  • @MrTonystar1 Most of them.

  • U white-devils would rather have kc anthony's blood

  • Probly a bush! I know u gone act like u dont see the driver!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more