Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Hannity's Own Expert Pwns Him on Anti-Obama Bias

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
86,311
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.
  • likes, 100 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,779)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @debateyourfaith What are you on about?

  • Rahmbo is trying to prevent ALL protests in Chicago

    Check out the "sit down and shut up"ordinance that Rahmbo is trying to ram down the throats of citizens

    In the last protest of numbers over 500 people were arrested because the police didnt have their shit together. Something the cpd has been plagued with for decades but has made efforts to control their police state tactics

    Oh by the way, all 500 arrested were let go in court by a pissed off judge condemning the actions of the city

    RECALL RAHM

  • @wargasm58

    but your comment leaves much to be desired grammatically. Should probably read:

    "Considering your grammatical skills, YOU don't even speak English"

    the second part just fails to make any sense. What does English fluency have to do with criticizing? It doesn't pass muster in any grammatical sense. Maybe try this

    "Let alone SHOULD YOU criticize anyone..."

    or

    "Let alone USE IT TO criticize anyone..." (it being English)

    Hope that was helpful :D

  • @wargasm58

    Given the awkward tense I was writing in (don't have the name for it, but talking to a charachter in the past in reference to that same character's future thoughts) I'm pretty sure that grammar was nearly flawless. I'll give you that maybe I should have replaced "Future you" with "Future Cenk" to make it more clear as to what I am referring. But to question my English fluency is absurd!

    Clearly I am able to speak english if I am mastering such an awkward tense

  • @wargasm58

    So now that you have maybe gained some perspective on the nature of that comment, where it stems from, you can see that I wasn't critiquing anyone, but pointing out playfully and absurdly how opinions on President Obama have shifted so dramatically since his initial election and the first few "honeymoon months" that followed.

    I think we have thoroughly dissected this minor comment. On to the more disconcerting matter of YOU calling out MY grammar?!?!

  • @wargasm58

    let me spell this out for you, here are the main points to keep in mind

    -watching a video from 2 years ago

    -Cenk (the dude talking) was defending Obama and the white house

    -Cenk (today) no longer defends Obama, but is one of his biggest progressive critics

    My comment, with tongue placed firmly in cheek, pointed out how is it funny how Cenk of this video ("past Cenk") might be shocked with todays Cenk's (or "future Cenk") view of the Obama white house and policies

  • @wargasm58

    *sigh*

    how do I get a comment like this and not respond rudely? I have such a dilemma?

    are you

    a) a troll looking for a verbal spar?

    b) did you just not read the comment or do you not regularly watch TYT, so just don't understand what it was referring to?

    c) just a plain old fucking moron

    I sincerely hope you're able to see the hilarious irony of calling out someone's grammar with you're own horrible grammar.

    Alas, I shall try!

    no child left behind, and all that fun business

  • @dantheleafsfan1 Considering your grammatical skills, your don't even speak English, let alone criticize anyone...

  • lol "pwns" in the title. amazing

  • oh past cenk.... if only you could see how much future you would despise Obama

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more