Rahmbo is trying to prevent ALL protests in Chicago
Check out the "sit down and shut up"ordinance that Rahmbo is trying to ram down the throats of citizens
In the last protest of numbers over 500 people were arrested because the police didnt have their shit together. Something the cpd has been plagued with for decades but has made efforts to control their police state tactics
Oh by the way, all 500 arrested were let go in court by a pissed off judge condemning the actions of the city
but your comment leaves much to be desired grammatically. Should probably read:
"Considering your grammatical skills, YOU don't even speak English"
the second part just fails to make any sense. What does English fluency have to do with criticizing? It doesn't pass muster in any grammatical sense. Maybe try this
"Let alone SHOULD YOU criticize anyone..."
or
"Let alone USE IT TO criticize anyone..." (it being English)
Given the awkward tense I was writing in (don't have the name for it, but talking to a charachter in the past in reference to that same character's future thoughts) I'm pretty sure that grammar was nearly flawless. I'll give you that maybe I should have replaced "Future you" with "Future Cenk" to make it more clear as to what I am referring. But to question my English fluency is absurd!
Clearly I am able to speak english if I am mastering such an awkward tense
So now that you have maybe gained some perspective on the nature of that comment, where it stems from, you can see that I wasn't critiquing anyone, but pointing out playfully and absurdly how opinions on President Obama have shifted so dramatically since his initial election and the first few "honeymoon months" that followed.
I think we have thoroughly dissected this minor comment. On to the more disconcerting matter of YOU calling out MY grammar?!?!
let me spell this out for you, here are the main points to keep in mind
-watching a video from 2 years ago
-Cenk (the dude talking) was defending Obama and the white house
-Cenk (today) no longer defends Obama, but is one of his biggest progressive critics
My comment, with tongue placed firmly in cheek, pointed out how is it funny how Cenk of this video ("past Cenk") might be shocked with todays Cenk's (or "future Cenk") view of the Obama white house and policies
@debateyourfaith What are you on about?
MegaWinnieGirl 1 day ago
Rahmbo is trying to prevent ALL protests in Chicago
Check out the "sit down and shut up"ordinance that Rahmbo is trying to ram down the throats of citizens
In the last protest of numbers over 500 people were arrested because the police didnt have their shit together. Something the cpd has been plagued with for decades but has made efforts to control their police state tactics
Oh by the way, all 500 arrested were let go in court by a pissed off judge condemning the actions of the city
RECALL RAHM
debateyourfaith 1 week ago
@wargasm58
but your comment leaves much to be desired grammatically. Should probably read:
"Considering your grammatical skills, YOU don't even speak English"
the second part just fails to make any sense. What does English fluency have to do with criticizing? It doesn't pass muster in any grammatical sense. Maybe try this
"Let alone SHOULD YOU criticize anyone..."
or
"Let alone USE IT TO criticize anyone..." (it being English)
Hope that was helpful :D
dantheleafsfan1 2 weeks ago
@wargasm58
Given the awkward tense I was writing in (don't have the name for it, but talking to a charachter in the past in reference to that same character's future thoughts) I'm pretty sure that grammar was nearly flawless. I'll give you that maybe I should have replaced "Future you" with "Future Cenk" to make it more clear as to what I am referring. But to question my English fluency is absurd!
Clearly I am able to speak english if I am mastering such an awkward tense
dantheleafsfan1 2 weeks ago
@wargasm58
So now that you have maybe gained some perspective on the nature of that comment, where it stems from, you can see that I wasn't critiquing anyone, but pointing out playfully and absurdly how opinions on President Obama have shifted so dramatically since his initial election and the first few "honeymoon months" that followed.
I think we have thoroughly dissected this minor comment. On to the more disconcerting matter of YOU calling out MY grammar?!?!
dantheleafsfan1 2 weeks ago
@wargasm58
let me spell this out for you, here are the main points to keep in mind
-watching a video from 2 years ago
-Cenk (the dude talking) was defending Obama and the white house
-Cenk (today) no longer defends Obama, but is one of his biggest progressive critics
My comment, with tongue placed firmly in cheek, pointed out how is it funny how Cenk of this video ("past Cenk") might be shocked with todays Cenk's (or "future Cenk") view of the Obama white house and policies
dantheleafsfan1 2 weeks ago
@wargasm58
*sigh*
how do I get a comment like this and not respond rudely? I have such a dilemma?
are you
a) a troll looking for a verbal spar?
b) did you just not read the comment or do you not regularly watch TYT, so just don't understand what it was referring to?
c) just a plain old fucking moron
I sincerely hope you're able to see the hilarious irony of calling out someone's grammar with you're own horrible grammar.
Alas, I shall try!
no child left behind, and all that fun business
dantheleafsfan1 2 weeks ago
@dantheleafsfan1 Considering your grammatical skills, your don't even speak English, let alone criticize anyone...
wargasm58 2 weeks ago
lol "pwns" in the title. amazing
gmsquared 2 weeks ago
oh past cenk.... if only you could see how much future you would despise Obama
dantheleafsfan1 2 weeks ago