Ron Paul in the Huffington Post - wimps out again
Uploader Comments (CANTvoteHillary)
Top Comments
-
Oh great, here he goes again yelling at the poor Ron Paul office girl. Pathetic.
Have you ever seen Ron Paul's speech on the House floor titled "Neo-conned"?
You are a whiney blowhard who somehow figured out how to hook up your microphone.
What magic are you going to whip up for us next?
Maybe you can badger the ghost of Ronald Reagan for saying "Mr. Gorbechev, tear down this wall!"
What wall? The Great Wall of China? The Wailing Wall? He wasn't SPECIFIC!!! How dare him!
-
Because to accuse someone "specifically" requires definitive proof. It requires an investigation to know exactly who was complicit and who was subject to faulty information or degrees of both.
This act requires a majority of Congress to initiate an investigation. He has already stated that he would support such an investigation, and would call for impeachment if evidence corroborated guilt.
I hope this answers your questions.
Video Responses
All Comments (27)
-
Yeah nice way to side step the real point he was making. The REAL issue isnt what he said when and how can he prove that we were lied to and all that. The REAL issue is WTF are we doing there!! And now you can say, "lame ass argument explaining why we are in iraq and afghanistan probably based on misinformation and LIES" Oooh the terrorists hate us cuz we are free bullshit.
-
Thats funny are you joking?
Your welcome
-
Ron Paul has consistently blamed the neocons.
Read his speeach on the house floor July 10, 2003 entitled "Neo CONNED !"
-
also ron paul is saying lots of people lied, from all over, ur an idiot to ask such a dumb question thats so simple that the lady doesnt even know if u joking or not. lie as in the 9/11 commision report was a lie, and much more.
-
He doesn't need to address the specifics as they have been public knowledge for so long. If you don't know who he is referring to, then guess where your head has been for the last 8 years.
-
It's only sad to you because you have chosen to make that a priority in the central theme of your argument.
You never asked Ron Paul or anyone else for that matter, if that was their agenda. What is most ironic is that you have consumed most of your energy doing nothing, when you could have run for office and tried to impeach Bush yourself.
The problem is you never really understood what Ron Paul was ever about. Changing government from the ground up is what we want.
-
I thought you were the expert on Ron Paul.
I am surprised that none of the Paulites can tell me whether George Bush lied or not;
or whether
Bush and Cheney should have been impeached.
"HAPHAZARDLY"?????????????
ARE YOU JOKING??????
You have just WIMPED OUT - major wimp out....
sad
-
You're asking me?? I thought you were supposed to be the expert?
Took me 5 seconds btw - /watch?v=3hLVhgm_glc
He has always stated that he supports a judicial investigation because our laws demand that you are innocent before proven guilty.
However, Ron Paul believes this administration misled us into war, either deceitfully or haphazardly. Regardless, belief alone isnt enough to impeach anyone. You need an investigation which can only be approved by the majority.
This guy is an idiot. Why say this to a staffer. This lady just answers phones.
Stupid!!!! and Worthless!!!!!
Bhanna4d 3 years ago
Your YouTube Channel is
STUPID!!! and WORTHLESS!!!
BTW thanks for watching..
CANTvoteHillary 3 years ago