Noah's Ark and the Flood debated -- National Geographic
Top Comments
All Comments (204)
-
@Sevenfold120 Don't forget, Genesis said the ark had 7 pairs of clean animals, but only 4 pairs of humans. LOL! We would be more inbred than many farm animals!
-
@InternetDarkLord DNA today shows we (homo-sapians) are descended from at the very least 10,000 people not from a couple on Noahs Ark. DNA would clearly show evidence for Noahs Ark. But it doesnt. It shows the opposite. Same for other animals in order for the animals to interbreed there would need to be a high mutation rate which we would still have today.
-
@Sevenfold120 Insert a hillbilly joke! I guess they could marry relatives, but the inbreeding would be amazing! DNA today would show the results.
-
@InternetDarkLord Well their descendants wouldnt be able to propagate with their sisters and brothers right?
-
@ACCSESS247 Because most Americans are fawking ignorant.
-
@gregrutz 1. Some sedimentary rock is not formed by water.
2. Many fossils are not on hills.
3. Tectonic uplift.
4. Which one?
5. Are you a Poe?
-
@SpencerBenedict2nd Bull Shit, I never said the animals on the ark were related, I said their descendants would be.
-
@SpencerBenedict2nd So answer the question.
@SpencerBenedict2nd Blanket statements made without proof are dismissed just as quickly. Additionally, arguments using ad hominem are also discarded. Since you seem to still have nothing further to say of any real import, or with any supporting data, you will be ignored.
NorthForkFisherman 4 months ago 3
Why are so-called educated people here in the west still discussing this subject, it's 2011 & time to put these outdated myths to rest.
ACCSESS247 3 months ago 2