4.0 V6 Ranger Flowmaster Loud Exhaust

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
94,450
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 26, 2006

This is my 1998 V6 4.0 Ford Ranger with a 40 series flowmaster muffler 1 outlet with a turn down with not converters

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Sounds beastly for a v6. Wish they would have put the 4.9 Inline Six in the rangers instead :/

  • So it seems we do have some common ground after all. But if the big 3 go down, then I'm going to be buying used american cars for the rest of my life.

see all

All Comments (175)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • did you keep the Cats on? my 4.0 aerostar still has both of its catilitic converters on, not sure if i should bag them or not

  • The one I use to have sounded more beast and the muffler just fell off. Also, my 3.1 Malibu sounds better.

  • @Bajaheat would have had a shit ton of torque and would have been decent on gas. Think about when people put v8s in rangers and s10s. They really aren't too bad on gas and I think the 4.9 was perfect for the ranger. The rangers torque in the engine is high in the rpms, the 4.9 would have it MUCH lower and in the useful "truck range" of torque rather the "car range" of torque.

  • @magazinedude2002 why they were gashogs...4.0s are just as reliable as the 4.9s were

  • @perry244 the dynomax systems do a better job, see the ranger on youtube with the ultraflo system

  • sounds good till after it revs and aounds like a tin can ratteling

  • @18schoolboy yeah funny thing i went to see what your v8 with no cat and a cherry bomb sounded like and it said you had not uploaded any videos...........so put up or shut up!

  • sounds like crap. my v8 sounds a lot better and i have no cat with a cherry bomb glasspack single exhaust.

  • @gangbang5able Actually on a 94 Ranger your 02 sensor is in front of the Cat and will Not throw the Check Engine light. I use to have a 95 Explorer with the same engine and exhaust is exactly the same as my 94 Ranger and I gutted the cats on it and put a Flowmaster super 44 on it and it didn't throw a code or mess with the engine at all. With that Flowmaster Super 44 That was the deepest v6 I have ever heard in person.

  • @6422m That 3.5l Ecoboost is a beast of an engine especially for a v6, If I had the cash to do it I would wait a year or two and buy a wrecked f150 and swap a Ecoboost into my old ranger.

    You get more power then the chevy 5.3L and Dodge 5.7L V8s but you get better fuel milage in a smaller more compact engine. Hard to beat that. Now if they would build an Ecoboost v8 haha.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more