everything thing i've read and heard her say in interviews both of these are untrue. yes, rape victims may have gotten charged, but it was not her law that set that in motion rather she may have inherited it. i don't disagree that a ron paul type would straighten out our finaces, and what i've read about bob barr, the same. but i know bob barr will not become president in this election therefor i look at it as a wasted vote. yes to God-people need to be living to a highter standard/quality
She requested the banning of books and she supported the charging for rape kits. Both proven. I am leaning Libertarian or an Independent. Nothing wrong with someone who want us to keep our civil liberties instead of taking more away. I'm confused. Do you think God is or is not a problem?
who says she didn't earn the right? you? this was never said about the governors who ran on the top of the ticket..reagan,clinton..19 governors that have became PRES! what has obama done?..never introduced a bill of legislation, voted present 130x, never fought against is own party yet campaigns as a uniter..what qualifies him to be PRESIDENT? oh, he's a trial lawyer who went to harvard, sure that's enough. and we differ vastly. not recognizing God is the biggest problem in this country!
Palin didn't earn the right to be where she is. We agree the Supreme Court should only follow the law. I don't what it says on the dollar other then United States and I do believe in the pledge of allegiance but I do not think under god should be included. This country was founded on freedom of religion and religion should be taught by the family and church and should not be in the public school. Palin wanted to charge victims for rape kits. I don't that as the rights of the victim.
con't...someone who does not strive to acheive success by hard work, risk and sacrifice being govermentally reward for sitting on their lorals, or ass! my second committment is to our supreme court ruling on the side of law, not interpretation. i believe in "in god we trust" on our currency, the pledge of allegiance in our schools and victims rights being upheld rather than the perpetrator's. guess i'm old fashioned that way. our country is great how it is otherwise other would not flock here
ah ha! we finally agree on something, the ethanol subsities. yes natural gas is a fossil fuel but does burn cleaner. what do you want electic cars? some would agrue that in order to obtain the electricity would require the use of coal and that would have exact opposite end result on the environment you are trying to acheive. enviroment really isn't my main priority tho so you've got me on this one. my concern is the loss of capitalism being replaced by "fairness". i don't believe in
I don't think he loves war, I think he is bitter about it and will make rash and bad choices. So do many of the Republican he works with. He voted down every alternative energy proposal that has come up in the last 8 years and there is nothing in his proposed budget for either alternative energy or education. Although I do agree with his stand on ethanol.
Natural gas is still a fossil fuel and not enough. She also fought to let oil companies drill in the Alaska wildlife reserve and she backed the Bridge to Nowhere until congress pulled the plug on it. And she can see Russia from where she lives. She also left Wasilla with and 19 Mil deficit they didn't have when she started.
everything thing i've read and heard her say in interviews both of these are untrue. yes, rape victims may have gotten charged, but it was not her law that set that in motion rather she may have inherited it. i don't disagree that a ron paul type would straighten out our finaces, and what i've read about bob barr, the same. but i know bob barr will not become president in this election therefor i look at it as a wasted vote. yes to God-people need to be living to a highter standard/quality
rkrager8 3 years ago
She requested the banning of books and she supported the charging for rape kits. Both proven. I am leaning Libertarian or an Independent. Nothing wrong with someone who want us to keep our civil liberties instead of taking more away. I'm confused. Do you think God is or is not a problem?
briscoc 3 years ago
p.s. the rape kits were being charge by the hospitals, not the state..that myth, along with her banning library books has been dispelled
rkrager8 3 years ago
so if you're not for obama, think mccain is a war mongare, obviously dispies palin..who is your candidate? or who would have been your pick?
rkrager8 3 years ago
who says she didn't earn the right? you? this was never said about the governors who ran on the top of the ticket..reagan,clinton..19 governors that have became PRES! what has obama done?..never introduced a bill of legislation, voted present 130x, never fought against is own party yet campaigns as a uniter..what qualifies him to be PRESIDENT? oh, he's a trial lawyer who went to harvard, sure that's enough. and we differ vastly. not recognizing God is the biggest problem in this country!
rkrager8 3 years ago
Palin didn't earn the right to be where she is. We agree the Supreme Court should only follow the law. I don't what it says on the dollar other then United States and I do believe in the pledge of allegiance but I do not think under god should be included. This country was founded on freedom of religion and religion should be taught by the family and church and should not be in the public school. Palin wanted to charge victims for rape kits. I don't that as the rights of the victim.
briscoc 3 years ago
con't...someone who does not strive to acheive success by hard work, risk and sacrifice being govermentally reward for sitting on their lorals, or ass! my second committment is to our supreme court ruling on the side of law, not interpretation. i believe in "in god we trust" on our currency, the pledge of allegiance in our schools and victims rights being upheld rather than the perpetrator's. guess i'm old fashioned that way. our country is great how it is otherwise other would not flock here
rkrager8 3 years ago
ah ha! we finally agree on something, the ethanol subsities. yes natural gas is a fossil fuel but does burn cleaner. what do you want electic cars? some would agrue that in order to obtain the electricity would require the use of coal and that would have exact opposite end result on the environment you are trying to acheive. enviroment really isn't my main priority tho so you've got me on this one. my concern is the loss of capitalism being replaced by "fairness". i don't believe in
rkrager8 3 years ago
I don't think he loves war, I think he is bitter about it and will make rash and bad choices. So do many of the Republican he works with. He voted down every alternative energy proposal that has come up in the last 8 years and there is nothing in his proposed budget for either alternative energy or education. Although I do agree with his stand on ethanol.
briscoc 3 years ago
Natural gas is still a fossil fuel and not enough. She also fought to let oil companies drill in the Alaska wildlife reserve and she backed the Bridge to Nowhere until congress pulled the plug on it. And she can see Russia from where she lives. She also left Wasilla with and 19 Mil deficit they didn't have when she started.
briscoc 3 years ago