Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Paper, powder and explosive flashes

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,159
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 15, 2007

Excerpt from Rick Siegel's documentary "9-11 Eyewitness: Hoboken" that shows direct visual evidence of explosive flashes during the Twin Tower collapses, as well as detailed eyewitness testimonies.

http://www.911eyewitness.com/

Higher res .avi version of this clip:
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (plaguepuppy)

  • The reason I don't think exotic weapons were used is that they didn't need them. This was a conventional demolition. The paper was not a part of the explosion. It was released to try to mask the bright charge flashes. In stage magic it's called a "cover". It's water into wine all over again.

  • Interesting thought - there is an air of David Copperfield stage magic, some very complex sleight of hand at all levels, but especially in the shuffling of planes. Some of the tail numbers are still recorded as active, and as I recall one flight only flew on 9-11.

  • Leaving aside the exotic weapons question, there were a lot of pyrotechnics used, and the initial fireballs had a definite action movie look - big orange rounded balls of flame, lots of shock-n-awe value. But is that how fuel moving at 500mph is going to look if it gets ignited passing through the building?

  • RDAWG is correct on every fact.

    The white flashes is called REFLECTION.

    The cars look bad because of the dust

  • Nope, those flashes are much too bright to be "reflections" from sheets of paper. Notice the direction of the sunlight hitting the dust cloud (just before the 60 sec. point in the video) and you will see that by the location of the flashes that they could not be caused by reflections.

    As for the cars, dust does not cause melting and deformation of steel. Many of the cars are partly "melted" and deformed, yet parts right next to the deformed portions show no sign of heat damage.

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the man at 4:44 is Barry Jennings and he work for the nyc housing authority in WTC7. He became trapped in WTC7 with Micheal Hess. After both men were rescued they both told of explosions happening all around them in WTC7. However a short time after Mr. Hess changed his story. Mr. Jennings NEVER DID!!! He is said to have passed away on Aug. 19th 2008 at the age of 53 from circumstances not yet disclosed. THANK YOU MR. JENNINGS FOR TELLING THE TRUTH R.I.P.

  • i think the flashes were the sun hitting the blown glass.

  • thermonuclear explosion?? did this guy just said thermonuclear explosion !??!!?!??!? 3:17

    Just as i heard that.... i knew this was all shit.

    I do think it was a programmed demolition, but for fuck's sake, dont use bullshit to prove it.

  • Wow, 30 seconds in and I can see this guy is clearly full of shit. I can't believe in 30 seconds he's already lied twice. Under 1 min and he's up to 4 lies. Wow, anyone that believes any of this crap needs to seek medical help immediately

  • "Have you actually watched this video here that you are spamming??"

    So making you look like an idiot is called "spamming" now. Interesting.

    "I think you really need a friend or something... not me, but somebody..."

    Which one of us replied to the other first?

  • LOL!! You can't even correct yourself, because you really don't know what the heck the official story is. You're arguing something is false and you don't even know what that something is. That's the definition of an idiot.

  • "They use different words, but yeah, its the same thing..."

    No, it's not at all the same thing. The official story never stated that jet fuel was responsible for the heat that weakened the core and perimeter columns. Seeing as how you don't even know this basic fact, why should anyone believe anything you say?

  • "Well the much later, heavily abashed version implies that jet fuel (kerosene) somehow burned long enough and intense enough to soften the MaSSiVe Core columns"

    Who made up this theory? This certainly isn't the official story.

  • Why do you avoid the question and hurl insults instead of just explaining the jet fuel theory? If you were confident in your position, you would've just explained it already.

    I've heard many variations of said theory, just want to know which one you're on.

  • No actually, I don't. Explain it to me. Or don't you want to go down that road?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more