TREASON: U.S. Supreme Court Decision Constitution Void

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20110118.CL31921&show_artic...

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/

THREE actions filed at The Supreme Court are all easily accessed from the SCOTUS website -- http://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx

Just enter windsor, william, and then see 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690.

ATLANTA, Jan. 18, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: DENIED.

Presented with this information and massive proof that was not contested in any manner by the accused judges, at least six of the justices voted to deny the petitions:

"There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter. These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons. Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case. The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court."

The key questions answered negatively by the U.S. Supreme Court was:

"Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts."

By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will.

William M. Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a civil lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

Despite this undeniable proof, 32-year federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay a fortune in legal fees of Maid of the Mist. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied).

After attempting to get the case reopened with new evidence that proved fraud upon the courts and obstruction of justice, Judge Evans and Judge William S. Duffey committed a variety of crimes and violations of Constitutional rights, as did judges with the Eleventh Circuit. All of this was detailed for the Supreme Court.

Windsor says: "I have discovered that the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia, Washington, DC, and the justices of the United States Supreme Court function like common criminals intentionally making bogus rulings against honest people while covering up the crimes of their fellow judges. I have been contacted by people from all over the country and around the world with their stories of judicial corruption with judges all over the U.S.

"My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and Congress. I do not believe there is a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. In my opinion, we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

"In my opinion, this is the most serious issue that our country has ever faced. Our rights have been stolen. And the mainstream media refuses to cover this story because they are afraid of the judges. Heaven help us.

"I believe our only hope in America is if the masses become aware of what is taking place. I am writing an expose, and my book will be available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and on amazon.com soon. The publisher will decide if the title is Lawless America or Screwed, Glued, and Tattooed."

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• NWO Treason
• Constitution Void
• Criminal U.S. Supreme Court
• Satanist Elites
• Black Nobility
• 666
• Constitution Betrayal
• USA Betrayed
• Judicial Crimes

[thewhisperingeagle]

If you know your Constitution, you know that such laws are automatically null and void.

[khorn1994]

this is the end of democracy... they passed the bill.... its all over...

[merxen]

If they voided the constitution, what are they still doing in their seats? Shouldn't that leave them out in the cold also?

[wiseuporbedead]

ALSO FROM ENGLAND

Please urgently contact Roger Hayes of the British Constitution Group... he would like to talk to you about your predicament. Please contact him via hayes_roger@sky.com

Thank you.

[linphil57]

Greetings from England. I watched this with my jaw dropped. Here we have similar things happening. 1 person in my neck of the woods standing up to OUR traitors is Norman Scarth an 86 yr old WW2 war hero jailed in July 2011. Best wishes sir

[lamapper]

TREASON, if you check in the Constitution, you will find caveats to what amounts to treason, actually requires war time related stuff.

Also RICO laws were very finely defined in such a way that they could not be used against the court, having to do with money coming from proven illegal activity and other legalize.

Change the House first, than go after Oath of Office violators, in SCOTUS case where they violate their constitutional mandate...also taints every ruling that justice has ruled on

[ahamatmabrahman]

@TNGadFly or booted into fema camp ovens History shows that the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto waited untill only 10% were still alive before they decided to fight back

[TNGadFly]

What would happen if a person walked into a federal court, paid his filing fee and issued upon the defendant being the United States an action moving the court to strike, void and erase the entire Fourth Amendment. What would be the result? Ever read how courts extend police power to pretty much excuse any intrusion into your home? People that live in a shell spout things like "you need a warrant". In reality, NO THEY DO NOT. That's just the way it is.

[TNGadFly]

This sounds bad doesn't it. The question now is, SO WHAT? If we are indeed a police state are we going to take to the streets as other countries with backbones have done? That answer is NO. Will we miss however many days of work that is needed to protest? That answer is NO as well. I say write your blogs, write your books, have fun. But at the end of the day the system always wins. It will continue to win until people are beaten down and broke, hungry to the point that they no longer care.

[VEGASINTN]

Yea good upload....Obama mentioned this in 2001 at Chicago University.This subverts the legislative process entirely.People don't realize this is how they seek tyranny by pushing these orders.People argue they can come back and repeal these decisions...by the time Congress tries to pass anything against this order its way too late.Imperialism at its best.Best explanation on vid so far..peace