Naturalism
Loading...
Loading...
153
views
Loading...
Uploaded by chuckpcr on Feb 15, 2010
http://gscim.com This is a description of philosophical position of Naturalism.
http://creationsciencetalk.blogspot.com
http://genesismission.4t.com
http://store.gscim.com
- 1 likes, 0 dislikes
-
Uploader Comments (chuckpcr)
Video Responses
This video is a response to Dawkins of the Gap
Loading...
- 4:13
Introduction to Naturalismby Nirmuktavideos7,866 views
- 2:46
Philosophy of Scienceby chuckpcr159 views
- 1:33
Humanistic Naturalismby NatureCompassion773 views
- 4:23
Science and the Supernaturalby chuckpcr296 views
- 9:54
Philosophical Naturalismby NaoTio1,887 views
- 1:13
Inductive Reasoningby chuckpcr1,254 views
- 10:00
Naturalism: Religion the Natural Wayby opensourcebuddhism364 views
- 2:15
Science and Religion in Conflictby chuckpcr62 views
- 10:01
Darwinism: Science or Naturalistic Philosophy (2 of 11)by IDquest4,410 views
- 9:55
Darwinism: Science or Naturalistic Philosophy (1 of 11)by IDquest9,252 views
- 11:00
VenomFangX - Refuting Atheistic Naturalism 1by FootWashingSinner211 views
- 1:09
Creationismby chuckpcr18 views
- 5:33
RE: VenomFangX 'Refuting Atheistic Naturalism'by humanistfuture561 views
- 2:44
8. Christianity vs Scientific Naturalism: Garrett Hardin's conclusionby drcraigvideos543 views
- 4:31
Natureby JellyOMan635,681 views
- 4:11
6. Christianity vs Scientific Naturalism: Garrett Hardin's rebuttalby drcraigvideos602 views
- 10:54
Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (1 of 6): by Alvin Plantingaby philosophyreligion5,115 views
- 2:22
Is naturalism the same as science?by drcraigvideos1,058 views
- 41:22
Robert A. Delfino: "Scientific Naturalism and the Need for a Neutral Metaphysical Framework"by universidaddenavarra332 views
- 4:02
Governing Principals of Realityby jericomovie500 views
Yes that is mostly correct. If the Supernatuaral was real there would be some form of proof. There is no proof the Supernatural operates so there are no gods.
peterb1968 5 months ago
@peterb1968
Actually there is evidence for the supernatural but as I stated in the video Naturalism requires forcing naturalistic explanations. So since you clearly hold to Philosophical Naturalism you will see nothing as evidence for the supernatural. Thank you for such a nice example of my point.
chuckpcr 5 months ago
@chuckpcr What evidence? Remember it needs to be repeatable and testable ,eg, the bible is not proof neither is personal experience.
peterb1968 5 months ago
@peterb1968 Try the fact that we are here.
A supernatural event is by definition an event that results form something outside the universe. It is an excepted fact of science that the Universe had a beginning. That beginning had to have been triggered from outside the universe and therefore by definition was a supernatural event.
chuckpcr 4 months ago
@chuckpcr
I accidentally used the wrong word in second line 5th word it should be “accepted” not “excepted”.
chuckpcr 4 months ago
@peterb1968
I find it interesting that you declared there to be mo proof of the supernatural and then insist on limiting the definition of evidence specifically to eliminate the evidence you want to ignore. Thanks once again for proving the point this video
chuckpcr 4 months ago