Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Arlen Specter Interrogates Anita Hill

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
27,437
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 20, 2009

Arlen Specter interrogates Professor Anita Hill during Judge Clarence Thomas' Nomination Hearing.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Arlen Specter----what a guy! Strokes his own ego by claiming Hill's credibility was destroyed. She was far more credible than Thomas, even though Biden gave Thomas softball questions, unlike what Hill faced. specter wsa on the Kerner Commission that come up with a BS conclusion that there was no conspiracy to assassinate JFK (real credible). And then to show what a politician he is---he switches to Democratic party to save his seat.

  • Misogyny at its finest. Kudos to Specter for perpetuating the "she asked for it" mentality rampant in our collective thinking about sexual violence.

    Anita Hill should be a household name. All women in the United States owe her great thanks, and should strive to be as strong in conscience and effort as she was before, during, and after the hearing.

see all

All Comments (114)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Biden: "Senator Long Dong from New Jerk, I recognize you for 5 inches."

  • One of the greatest liars in American history.

  • 2:15......CHECK OUT HER EYES AND LIPS...YUMMY

  • woah!! did you hear him say "this situation has been illuminating to... ah ah " thats in clear reference to the illuminati....look at who else is in the video...Larry silverstein (weird creepy old dude from 911 truthers, then you have joe biden (the wannabe thug) are they all on the committee on foreign relations at that same moment? if they wanted clarence thomas down i could only wonder why lol now arlene specter is a comedian? i could only imagine the devices he will one up with..

  • @hereiam2005

    ...so concerned w/ due process & all wouldnt Thomas be innocent until proven guilty in court, yet your sure Hill is the victim. Actually it amazes how so many assume Thomas is guilty & how so few even bother to get the details. Like I said all she really accused him of was being a creep & I've seen tons of comments w/ stuff like they hope Thomas dies from cancer & suffers horribly from it. I guess they think he raped her I mean WTF

  • @hereiam2005

    ...need to say it she isnt in trouble, shes like a witness. Witnesses dont have lawyers when they testify in court, do they. Or do u think she needs a lawyer to protect her feelings from getting hurt. These hearings are only being held b/c of what she claimed so its a lil late for the victim card. Her timing is like an ex-wife showing up after you won the lottery saying she still loves you. Its called suspicious, so boo hoo they questioned her story.

    BTW since u seem...

  • @hereiam2005

    ...one is hard to swallow. I couldnt imagine anyone in any job talking about animal porn w/ co-workers. Am I right, who the hell would do that. Let alone up in white collar polite society & to a female, esp. since he was supposedly trying to get in her pants.

    But w/e putting all that aside & assuming it was all true there is nothing criminal about any of it.

    Why do you keep talking about an absence of a lawyer like they forbid her from having one. How many times do I...

  • @hereiam2005

    ...press. How on earth did that happen I wonder. Ur right tho they never should of had these hearings, only the FBI should have dealt with it. If they did you never would have heard of Anita Hill, b/c they never would have taken it to court, b/c there was nothing to take to court. All she claimed was he asked her out a bunch, something about a pubic hair on a coke can & he talked about ridiculous porno films including bestiality. I gotta say even at face value that...

  • @hereiam2005

    OK so if your practicing law then its not cool to sexually harass your female subordinates but anyone else like the president for example its cool. And what about all the women who accused Clinton of harassment. What about their 'due process' what about their justice. B/c the only case that saw the light of day was Lewinski and that was consensual.

    As for Hill she reported her 10yr old allegations to the FBI. And then, what a shocker, the interview was leaked to the...

  • @mikedd56 I mentioned Clinton simply to quote his ideas on governing. Don't confuse the sex and the charges. Read the book. And then we can have a serious discussion. I have read The Conscience of a Conservative. And although I don't agree with some of the point, some makes senses. We all disagree at some points - just don't defend your ideal at all cost. Even at the cost of our conscience - or justice.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more