Honda Civic Type-R (2004) VTEC Acceleration

CTR Driving

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Honda
• Civic
• Type-R
• CTR
• VTEC

[kalemdor1]

haahhaa ive noticed over the many v-tec posts how kids unable to buy a pint post up trolling remarks on how shit hondas are .. yet honda make the most engines in the world and dont need a turbo to undertake you in your dads overrated gas guzzler

[sausagenmuff]

@320bit HP determins how fast a car is, Torque determines if it can truck your fat ass girlfriend around

[dt88888d]

@Mr330d smokes like fuck though, my astra 1.9cdti 200bhp belted out black smoke like fuck

[Mr330d]

@cyanide02 good luck keeping front tires to it lol my brothers eats them i wouldn't mind a vectra 1.9 cdti 150 2008 shape put 19" alloys on it lower it on coilovers and re-map it it's not worth the extra money to go for the 3.0 v6 cdti you don't get that much more power something like 180-190 you could pass that with a re-map for the 150brake and still have change lol she'd be some craic on the motorway outpull most yokes and in fact a mapped astra can keep up with a mapped 330d 235bhp

[cyanide02]

@Mr330d yeah i've got one too mate. i'm saving to have it remapped to 170bhp off sport button and 200bhp on. I think the torque goes up to somewhere in the region of 270lb-ft. not bad from a dirty derv lol.

[320bit]

@Mr330d Early 90s C Classes are known to have alot of faults and poor build quality.

[Mr330d]

@320bit do you have the c250 cdi in america?? it's a 2.5 4 cyl twin turbo diesel pretty nice but the c320 cdi is a rocket my dad had a 1994 c250 d non turbo 2.5 5cyl pretty quick for only 113bhp though

[Mr330d]

@cyanide02 my brother has a 150bhp 1.9 cdti 3 dr astra and it'll do 140mph flatout and it gets there pretty damn quick 0-60 in like 8.6 or something i'd love to drive a re-mapped version though standard is 236lb-ft so that's a nice gain of torque

[320bit]

@WheelChairBndit I would never buy a Taurus at all.

[320bit]

@WheelChairBndit How is making the worlds fastest luxury saloons for the past 20 or 30 years a waste of power?

[WheelChairBndit]

@320bit their AMG models waste it by having 600+ hp and being slower than everything else. despite the weight, none of it goes to the ground. but 7 sec 0-60 is still respectable for any car. Audi does the same thing too as far as being a luxury saloon. and i would NEVER pay $30000 for a taurus lol.

[320bit]

@WheelChairBndit The Taurus starts at like $30k. And how do Mercedes waste their power? The C250 has 201hp from a 1.8L 4 cylinder starts at $32k and goes from 0-60 in 7 seconds. Which is the same as my 97 C280 and my C280 is listed as having 197hp. Obviously there is a weigh difference between the 2 cars, so 7 seconds for a 1.8L in a big luxury saloon is pretty nice.