Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Bush administration False Terror Alerts (part two)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,423
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 19, 2008

Bush administration False Terror Alerts for political gain. Keith Olbermann special comment.
--------------------------------------------
The recent claims by McCain's Charlie Black about a terrorist attack helping McCain were not spontaneous. The Republicans have done that before, and, remember, Karl Rove is now a free agent who "chats" to the McCain campaign.

Moreover, they are not novel. Beginning with the immediate aftermath of the Democratic Convention in 2004, and continuing through the fall campaign, the Bush Administration formally announced a rise in the terror threat every time polls showed the Kerry/Edwards campaign achieving some positive momentum.

Just like, as Bush Chief of Staff Andrew Card said in September of 2002, you don't "sell a war in August", there apparently was no "need" of multiple terrorist alerts prior to the Democratic Convention in 2004.

The first, coming within days of the Democratic Convention, blunted Kerry's post-convention bounce. Remember, at that time, Katrina had not yet happened, the Iraq War was only 18 months old, and the media were unwilling even to question that Bush was asleep-at-the-wheel on 9/11. Thus, terror alerts not only diverted attention, but had the predictable effect on peoples' psyches to lean toward the known compared to the unknown.

Moreover, the media were talking about Kerry's blunted bounce without reference to the "terror threat", lending credence to the suggestion that Kerry was ineffective as all candidates always receive post-convention bounces. It was virtually impossible for the Kerry camp to "call-out" these terror threats as shams because Bush had the weight of the federal government behind him, and, to have done so, would have been to put Kerry in the position of not heeding warnings--exactly what Bush had done prior to 9/11.

Subsequent examination of the "evidence" behind the threats showed them to be flimsy and mostly out-of-date. That, together with the pattern of their coming as Kerry/Edwards were showing some momentum in the polls, provides a very strong case for their being totally a concoction brewed for political gain. The absence of such announcements subsequently, with the regularity experienced in the fall of '04, nails the case shut.

And, of course, the Bush campaign had no one who would think of, much less do, this sort of political chicanery, right? No one who would lead the country into war so that they could enact their domestic agenda, and stifle democracy in our own country.

Certainly, the Kerry campaign made many mistakes--from an ineffective campaign manager to the Shrum "consultancy" group, and from windsurfing to verbal gaffes--but, consider objectively how close Kerry came: 30,000 votes in Ohio that themselves were likely a result of election-fraud in the form of inadequate voting machine numbers in key districts that resulted in hours-long lines and a Secretary of State who was Chair of the Bush Campaign in Ohio. This, despite $30 million of SwiftBoat ads, and Kerry's delayed response to that diatribe.

Using bogus fear of death, those terror alerts kept Bush in office and tragically cost a few thousand real US deaths and 15,000 maimed irrevocably for life, not to mention another 4 years of inaction on global warming and energy independence, and absence of a health care system that worked for all.

Bin Laden himself helped Bush. Recognizing an end to the Iraq War would send the might of the United States against him, and recognizing he duped Bush into believing Iraq was where the fight was, bin Laden must have wanted Bush to win, as he must McCain. So, he obliged by releasing a tape just before the election. And, it worked: he is still at-large, the Taliban is gaining strength, and the US is being bled in Iraq.

And, Rove is out there again, lurking, just "chatting" with the McCain campaign. His credibility has eroded, and the media is on to it, so Obama can call it out for what it is, when they try it again.

Calling it out in advance, as this article attempts to do, reduces its psychological impact when they do try it. But, constant vigilance, and repeatedly calling it out in advance, is required.

True, the evidence is circumstantial. But, do not let TV-legal dramas mislead anyone into believing that circumstantial evidence is insufficient to convict....even of murder.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-abrams/terror-threats-timed-to-t_b_109053....

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The "War on Terror" is a CIA Manufactured War on Freedom!

    Who really attacked us on 9/11? Do you want to know?

    Because the FBI has "No hard evidence linking Osama Bin Laden to 9/11"!

    We get called conspiracy theorists just for talking about it, when you can look up 250 Smoking Guns for an inside job! All the evidence is there for anyone who cares to do the research!

    Please Re-Investigate 9/11 and the TRUE History of that day! Please find the TRUTH and BE STRONG, not afraid!

  • Bad riddence bush admin and republicans...

see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 5- Voila 9/11 plus triggering furnitured terror situations around the globe.

    6- Instigate Terror among US and in specific countries to make allies and support invasions.

    7- Terror got out of control and chaos started to happen.

    8- US actual situation plus great pain among people all over.

    9- LOL

  • TO RECAPITULATE:

    1- The US had Economic total Collapse.

    2- They needed to conqueer more territory to retrieve MONEY.

    3- WTC was useless.

    4- They needed PEOPLE support to backup forein territory invasions.

  • the world is run by a bunch of cock suckers.

    they think they are hot shit but in reality they are a bunch of PENCIL PUSHIN WEAKLING NANCY BOYS.

    its time the strong retake this planet.

  • @Bi0hazardx since this was written, there is MUCH MORE info on the Great Deception. if you have not realised that there is something fishy going on, i suggest doing some focused research. then, figure out that the fishy smell is the eminent massgrave that we will know all too well.

    when confronted, take the red pill! and start using your brains!

  • CIRCULATE!

    impeachforpeace. org/ImpeachNow.html

    The "Do-It-Yourself Impeachment" IS a legitimate procedure. I called several representatives offices and asked.

    Please visit /user/paddedshell for more information.

    "In previous waves, over 500,000 downloads of the document represented over 1.7 million mailings".

    Given Bush's DIS-approval rating and the well over 225 million citizens old enough to vote...

    WE CAN DO BETTER THAN THAT!

    Copy and paste this everywhere.

  • geat vid

  • As always, thanks Keith!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more