Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

911 Eyewitness-Hoboken TV136 10 min. program

This is the 10 minute version from the new DVD, 911 Eyewitness-HOBOKEN TV136 Hoboken TV136 is a fast-paced, step-by-step look at what really happened on 09.11.01 in New York City. This DVD contai...  
 
Customize

More From: truebluestar

Loading...

QuickList(0)

25 ratings
Sign in to rate
8,479 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (13)   Options

Loading...
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
poloniawarrior (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Oh, the government never fabricates a story. [tongue in cheek] just like CPS never falsely accuses parents to steal their child for their federal funding trafficking in children racketeering.
superpencil007 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Well done audio voice over.
thewholesoul (2 years ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
who benefited from 911? answer this and you will have identified who did it.
FreedomRebel (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
mininuke or big ass thermate explosion...explains the molten steel 6 weeks after 9/11...
blgfun2007 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
One question that I would like answered is this, Immediately following the airplane hitting the building, firemen arrived in the lobby of the building. The lobby looked as if a bomb had gone off. If only the plane had struck the building at this time, why was the lobby in complete shambles. Nothing, had hit the lobby, the bulding had not started to collapse. So what happened in the lobby immediately following the plane crash? Anyone?
blgfun2007 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
I understand that he was on the 73rd floor. My point is that one floor has a huge "foot print" or square footage. That being said, it could have been a small area of the floor that he was seeing while the other part of this floor could have been on fire elsewhere. I don't dispute that there is more behing 911 truth but we must be carefull how we present evidence. More information is needed in regard to the 73rd floor.
blgfun2007 (2 years ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
For example, a report stating that no other part of the floor was on fire. This would lend more to the fireman's statement. Or an additional report stating that the opposite corner of the building was not on fire. We need full evidence not partial evidence or statements taken out of context. Those of us with open minds know there is more to 911 than we are being told in the official report.
thewholesoul (2 years ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
the colour of the smoke being black is a clear indication that it was low intensive and oxygen starved fire. although this doesnt directly answer your question it does somewhat support the firemens claim.
fanbutton (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
berkeleyhome, first you need to find out what the difference is between a conspiracy theory and a conspiracy.

The guy who posted this stated relative facts, thereby making this not a conspiracy theory but conspiracy period!

Good job, truebluestar! Keep the truthin coming!

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.