This is the 10 minute version from the new DVD, 911 Eyewitness-HOBOKEN TV136
Hoboken TV136 is a fast-paced, step-by-step look at what really happened on 09.11.01 in New York City.
This DVD contains powerful evidence that many people will find difficult to watch for the first time. To ease this information awareness shock, we have created three programs running 10 + 30 + 60 minutes (this google upload is the first of three). Watching these three programs in order over three days will result in minimal stress for viewers and induce a 9.11 epiphany based upon reality.
Ten minutes to Treason.
STEP 1 - Start off with a powerful 10-minute presentation that conclusively shows 911 was an inside job using science and common sense.
DVD available at:
http://www.911eyewitness.com
Oh, the government never fabricates a story. [tongue in cheek] just like CPS never falsely accuses parents to steal their child for their federal funding trafficking in children racketeering.
poloniawarrior 3 years ago
Well done audio voice over.
superpencil007 3 years ago
the colour of the smoke being black is a clear indication that it was low intensive and oxygen starved fire. although this doesnt directly answer your question it does somewhat support the firemens claim.
thewholesoul 4 years ago
who benefited from 911? answer this and you will have identified who did it.
thewholesoul 4 years ago 2
mininuke or big ass thermate explosion...explains the molten steel 6 weeks after 9/11...
FreedomRebel 4 years ago
One question that I would like answered is this, Immediately following the airplane hitting the building, firemen arrived in the lobby of the building. The lobby looked as if a bomb had gone off. If only the plane had struck the building at this time, why was the lobby in complete shambles. Nothing, had hit the lobby, the bulding had not started to collapse. So what happened in the lobby immediately following the plane crash? Anyone?
blgfun2007 4 years ago
For example, a report stating that no other part of the floor was on fire. This would lend more to the fireman's statement. Or an additional report stating that the opposite corner of the building was not on fire. We need full evidence not partial evidence or statements taken out of context. Those of us with open minds know there is more to 911 than we are being told in the official report.
blgfun2007 4 years ago
I understand that he was on the 73rd floor. My point is that one floor has a huge "foot print" or square footage. That being said, it could have been a small area of the floor that he was seeing while the other part of this floor could have been on fire elsewhere. I don't dispute that there is more behing 911 truth but we must be carefull how we present evidence. More information is needed in regard to the 73rd floor.
blgfun2007 4 years ago
berkeleyhome, first you need to find out what the difference is between a conspiracy theory and a conspiracy.
The guy who posted this stated relative facts, thereby making this not a conspiracy theory but conspiracy period!
Good job, truebluestar! Keep the truthin coming!
fanbutton 4 years ago
blgfun2007, had you been listening to the fireman's own words, he said that he was on the 73rd floor. I am pretty sure that the stairwells are marked with numerals so that people can identify which floor they are on within the tower.
fanbutton 4 years ago