Top Comments
All Comments (26)
-
Downward ejection was only in some early models due to the seats not having enough thrust to launch over the tail. Any of the production versions had standard upward-firing seats.
-
@keegan773 Really? I did not know. I also did not know we were arming the Germans in the the 60's, I thought it was to soon after the war.
Also are you German? I'd love to go to Germany someday, they seem such great people.
-
@82ndairborne100 No I refer to the Starfighter used by the German Airforce. There were frequent reports of fatalities on the T.V. news in the late 60's when I lived over there.
-
I like this fighter more than all the other planes of its era.
-
@keegan773 i think your thinking of the P-38 from WW2
-
Ah the Flying Coffin a.k.a. the Widow Maker, designed as an interceptor and used as an all weather fighter in Europe.
-
Such an Iconic plane.
-
-
I WANT ONE!! :)
-
@iowa61 USaf pilots would have run out of fuel 15 seconds after reaching the MIC 21 combat altitude. Intercepting "high flying bombers" (50 000 ft or more ?) would have to be done over the base...
This is my favourite jet ever, but as a combat weapor was nearly useless...
@thar777 That's because it's mission brief was NEVER dogfighting. It was designed to go after high-flying Russian bombers. It was an interceptor, NOT a fighter!
ninjarider1 1 year ago 5
Downward ejection? Yea that's all fine and dandy when you're flying in excess of 10,000 feet. At low altitude, you're screwed!
ryanspeed 8 months ago 3