侵權一線隔!不同名公司法OK同產品商標法NO

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
452 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 15, 2011

中天新聞》有招牌店名一字之差,卻有挨告和無罪的案例,主要是看公司法跟商標法的認定,先前金曠咖啡和金鑛咖啡官司,公司法認定兩字不同即不違法,但商標法卻認定因兩者都­賣咖啡,所以涉及侵害商標權,而50嵐和50剪因販賣商品完全不同,因此並無侵權問題。
更多完整報導,詳見:
http://video.chinatimes.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more