I love Sarah Palin, it's a shame she is not our president. Her intellect, wit, and knowledge far surpasses any candidate I have EVER heard. VIVA LA SARAH PALIN!
Sarah Palin is a spy with a fabricated name and history.
Learn what Obama, Osama, Biden, Bin Laden, the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists, and Sarah Palin had to do with the last presidential election and the military’s overthrow of our government.
@OriginalFroggyStyle It is important to expose the pathetic propaganda that is passed off as journalism these days. Americans deserve to get honest discourse on important issues like the debt ceiling and this was just irresponsible non sense. MSNBC has one of the worst ratings of cable news channels, and it is no wonder by seeing crap like this.
It is this Olbermann wannabe that is using the logical fallacy rather than addressing the substance of what Palin said about the debt ceiling. Instead they attempted to ridicule her by showing what she said about Paul Revere,(which Boston historians have confirmed that she was right about). 150 economists agree with Palin over Geitner, who could not even file his own taxes correctly.
At least you address issues, unlike most of the leftist that disregard the substance of her message to focus and lie about her intellect and attempt to smear her because they can't compete in the arena of ideas.
@bluegsp I agree on that much. But anybody who watches a major news network (CNN, FOX, MSNBC) for their news is an ignorant slob. I happen to agree with NOT raising the debt ceiling, but I also think that we should be saying "Fuck the troops" and cutting their wages, benefits, and getting our military spending to around 10% (rather than the 50% its at). I'm not conservative, I dislike Palin, and I'm extremely leftist, but I HATE when ANYBODY uses logical fallacies to attempt to prove THEIR point
@Marcownz747 The fact that they had to deploy this "logical fallacy" shows that they cannot argue the substance of her statement about the debt ceiling. But to be completely wrong in their attempt at ridicule of her just highlights their bias and agenda. Of course this is MSNBC which nobody watches or takes seriously anyway. XD
@Marcownz747 Yes, it actually was. If you read the history of that event and even Paul Reveres own account of it, you will learn that the mission of the British was to capture the colonies stores of weapons and ammunition and arrests Adams and Hancock. Paul warned the British that the colonists knew they were coming and 500 militia men were waiting for them. They then heard church bells and warning shots that convinced them that Paul was right and they released him and withdrew.
@bluegsp No, it actually wasn't. Her account of Paul Revere was terribly "re-written". There were no bells, it didn't serve as a warning to the British, and was literally only a warning to the people that the British were invading by sea (nothing about them "taking our arms"). But the logic doesn't matter. One's views on Paul Revere (Even if terribly inaccurate) don't make or break their economic views. The two just don't go together. It's the logical fallacy of Appeal-to-ridicule.
Sarah Palin has a degree in masturbation economics.
exsinor 1 month ago
I love Sarah Palin, it's a shame she is not our president. Her intellect, wit, and knowledge far surpasses any candidate I have EVER heard. VIVA LA SARAH PALIN!
BigSisterTutor 2 months ago
Sarah Palin is a spy with a fabricated name and history.
Learn what Obama, Osama, Biden, Bin Laden, the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists, and Sarah Palin had to do with the last presidential election and the military’s overthrow of our government.
StopAndReadThis 6 months ago
@OriginalFroggyStyle It is important to expose the pathetic propaganda that is passed off as journalism these days. Americans deserve to get honest discourse on important issues like the debt ceiling and this was just irresponsible non sense. MSNBC has one of the worst ratings of cable news channels, and it is no wonder by seeing crap like this.
bluegsp 7 months ago
@OriginalFroggyStyle Something tells me you are in over your head here.
It is this Olbermann wannabe that is using the logical fallacy rather than addressing the substance of what Palin said about the debt ceiling. Instead they attempted to ridicule her by showing what she said about Paul Revere,(which Boston historians have confirmed that she was right about). 150 economists agree with Palin over Geitner, who could not even file his own taxes correctly.
bluegsp 7 months ago
At least you address issues, unlike most of the leftist that disregard the substance of her message to focus and lie about her intellect and attempt to smear her because they can't compete in the arena of ideas.
bluegsp 7 months ago
@bluegsp I agree on that much. But anybody who watches a major news network (CNN, FOX, MSNBC) for their news is an ignorant slob. I happen to agree with NOT raising the debt ceiling, but I also think that we should be saying "Fuck the troops" and cutting their wages, benefits, and getting our military spending to around 10% (rather than the 50% its at). I'm not conservative, I dislike Palin, and I'm extremely leftist, but I HATE when ANYBODY uses logical fallacies to attempt to prove THEIR point
Marcownz747 7 months ago
@Marcownz747 The fact that they had to deploy this "logical fallacy" shows that they cannot argue the substance of her statement about the debt ceiling. But to be completely wrong in their attempt at ridicule of her just highlights their bias and agenda. Of course this is MSNBC which nobody watches or takes seriously anyway. XD
bluegsp 7 months ago
@Marcownz747 Yes, it actually was. If you read the history of that event and even Paul Reveres own account of it, you will learn that the mission of the British was to capture the colonies stores of weapons and ammunition and arrests Adams and Hancock. Paul warned the British that the colonists knew they were coming and 500 militia men were waiting for them. They then heard church bells and warning shots that convinced them that Paul was right and they released him and withdrew.
bluegsp 7 months ago
@bluegsp No, it actually wasn't. Her account of Paul Revere was terribly "re-written". There were no bells, it didn't serve as a warning to the British, and was literally only a warning to the people that the British were invading by sea (nothing about them "taking our arms"). But the logic doesn't matter. One's views on Paul Revere (Even if terribly inaccurate) don't make or break their economic views. The two just don't go together. It's the logical fallacy of Appeal-to-ridicule.
Marcownz747 8 months ago