Top Ten WW2 Tanks

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
124,475
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 27, 2008

these are the top 10 ww2 tanks in my opinion.
what i mean by performance is basically engine failures, gun failure, stuff like that.

Thanks for the views people, and the always helpful comments and opinons on these tanks. almost 20,000 views, keep it up.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • the GERMANS builded the BEST TANKS, NOW AND THEN, the americans cound destroy a tiger, not a pershing, not a priest, even a HOWITZER was having hard times when trying to brake down or kill the tiger AND its PERFECT and bestest crew!!

    LEARN THEN CRY 'BOUT THE RUSSIANS OR AMERICAN SCHEIZE!!!

  • @DeathFromAbove11B Maus was a complete waste of a tank. Wehrmacht could build about 20 more Tigers and Panthers which were 10 times more effective, if it wasn't stupid Hitler on their way.

    Maus had great armor and great armament, but it was completely worthless, due to the fact that it took 1h to move turret 360°, and it took 2h to cross 1km.

    Maus was more a propaganda tank, or a.k.a. giant with no brain.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Worlds Best Tank + Top 10 tanks ☆
see all

All Comments (919)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • if the t-34 got better rate because of production the sherman should be second it was more practicle and user friendly than the t-34 in th isreali war in 1947 modified shermans destroyed countless t-34s

  • @HachiZenki Military Channel? Do you have any idea how subjective and disgusting propaganda that is? Along with that crap of Discovery Channel.

    I watched their ''Top 10'' stuff, and I must tell you that I threw up immediately. That all is a common US propaganda, in which sadly, too many people believe.

  • @m4mihulja Go tell that to the guys being interviewed for The Military Channel's series, Greatest Tank Battles. One of the Sherman tank commanders said that the M18's gun could penetrate the frontal slope of the Panther.

  • @HachiZenki M18 Hellcat was a TD. And it's armor was so thin, that a 50mm shell could pass through it, and because of that, it was ineffective in battle.

    It's 76mm guns could penetrate 120mm at 100m at °0. Panther's frontal armor was 80mm at 60°. That means it couldn't penetrate it.

  • You forgot about he M18 Hellcat. Shitty armour (1-inch) but....FAST as hell and a great gun that could penetrate the frontal slope of a Panther tank.

  • I like the tiger in wot

  • I'm pretty sure you mean JS-2, and where are your sources?

  • SOMUA S35, B1/B1 bis ?

  • one word

    MAUS!!!

    Even though it was experimental, if it was mass produced or even a couple 100 it would own the tank battles of ww2 cause no allied weapon could enetrate the 220mm thick armor.

    Even the rear armor was thicker than the front armor of the tiger.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more