WTC2/UA175 First 9 CNN replays (From the 9/11 TV archive)

Carol Lin says you saw it live on CNN on the 6th replay. Fascinating. The other networks can use the local Washington affiliate (presumably the actual channel copied by US archive) excuse/argument when cutting important material from the archive footage (my fav example is Washington Channel 7 cutting ABC anchor Peter Jennings's exposure that the dick cheney was not in the Whitehouse on 9/11 so that we could see that Sam Ford was not at DCA - Washington Reagan airport), but CNN has no local network. So, archive has CNN using their affiliate WABC for the 9:03 faked footage where no impact was seen, not by the WABC correspondent on the ground, Winston Mitchell, nor by the studio anchor, Steve Bartelstein. Of course, CNN got the WABC material too early - before the "VCR" type errors (frame skips, wavy lines, scrump out) in playing the tapes were removed for archival purposes; WABC's coverage as reflected on CNN is very different from the ABC coverage kept in US archive. Check it out yourself;
archive.org/details/abc200109110831-0912
http://www.archive.org/details/abc200109110831-0912
archive.org/details/cnn200109110848-0929
http://www.archive.org/details/cnn200109110848-0929

So, it seems Carol Lin had access to a different broadcast than we were shown, because she thinks we saw the shot from the CNN fixed camera live. Not from the self serving, perp protecting version we are permitted to see in archive!

As you watch the replays, pay special attention to the fact that none show the "plane" entering the composition frame - the plane is poised and ready for its terminal flight well into the frame. Several replays show it waiting to start, rather odd for an aerial vehicle that depends on air speed for success in soaring. The 3rd, 4th and 5th replays make it clear that CNN is using the NASA Apollo deception technique of using a video camera to recapture recorded footage projected on a screen. Watch the amateurish camera movements as well as the freeze frame and zoom as the "plane" gets close to the halo enclosed tower. The "plane" crosses into the wtc1's halo boundary and seems to do the same beyond that into the north tower, but, Joe Craine says we have enough "crossing the line" videos. One questions why the dark side of the north tower would have a white halo, except if the towers are an animation addition to the video, like the plane image.

In the 1st replay, Vince Cellini doesn't know that the images are composed from the north, making the right view west, but he is actually a jock and can't be expected to know more advanced science topics.

In the slow motion segment, note the nose out shadow that falls across wtc2. It is very brief, but it is there. Don't ask yourself why the plane image, in the same field of vision as the towers, is less focused than they. You may finding yourself joining the "no plane" camp. Don't make the logic error of assuming there was no plane just because all the videos of a plane were fakes. You should demand, however, convincing proof that there were planes before you make the worse error of assuming there were planes.

And, of course, the $64,000 question, why were the amateurs able to zoom and pan with micro precision and nobody thought to zoom the CNN fixed wtc camera? At no time in the morning was it zoomed. We could have seen Edna Cintron in the plane shaped hole with that camera. We could have seen the wtc7 workers on the window washing scaffold, especially when they were casually putting it all away after 9:03. Of course, another problem with the CNN replay is that the WTC7 window washers are not there. Bush undoubtedly was monitoring the CNN fixed wtc camera before his faked booker school reading assignment, but he didn't see a plane. If there had been a plane recorded on that video, CNN would have been all over everybody with their copy of the event. There wasn't, they weren't.

Side issue is the very real fact that CNN's camera is a 24 hour fixed camera watching the World Trade Center. The first event was captured by it, but never released to the public, for good reason; like the pentagon cameras, it did not capture a plane crash.

A question for sexy Jon Stewart; is America, are you and those you love, better off with murderers and criminals getting away with 911 because all you guys on TV are afraid of losing your jobs? This is space science; in the tradition of NASA Apollo fakes. We must demand a free and independent media; run the criminals out of town.

Conjecture; the reason we were shown the weird freeze frame shot is because they made the "in the frame" mistake at the beginning and they wanted to make it look intentional. By deception wage war. By stealth wage war.

The shadow of wtc7 on wtc1 is another gross violation of time and space.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Brown
• aaron
• bush
• explosion
• Time
• sting
• scam
• cheat
• kill
• maim
• murder
• deceive
• oppression
• clinton
• obama
• silverstein
• larry
• billion
• dollars
• world
• trade
• center
• centre
• CD
• islam
• saudi
• dissident
• osama
• bin
• laden
• bill
• cooper
• 9-11
• disney
• abc
• cbs
• cnn
• fox
• tv fakery
• JFK
• kennedy
• isenhower
• military-industrial complex
• alex jones
• prisonplanet
• prison
• planet
• rense
• alawson911
• lawson
• 100
• 9/11
• suicide
• attack
• muslim
• european
• community
• expert
• NPT
• No plane theory
• american
• united
• 175
• 11
• 77
• 93
• yt:stretch=16:9

[lso5027]

I want you, who posted this video. To go to the men and women and children who WATCHED THOSE PLANES HIT and tell them to their faces that they didn't hit. That those people are lying and that you know best. You really do make me sick. You honestly think this didn't happen? Go to them, the thousands of people who watched this with their own eyes, and tell them it didn't happen.

[CNN911Fakes]

@lso5027 Faked news videos make me sick. I guess we have different priorities; I seek justice freedom and the gifts of my forebears. YOu enjoy a good magic show.

This video featured by CNN and shown at times square on 911 is a fake. A cheap, obvious fake.

[ntsecrets]

This guy obviously doesn't know how TV works... too bad.

[BUSean]

The channel owner is absolutely right. I was just at the North Tower on Wednesday. I bought a burrito and grabbed some souvenirs for the kids. It was a great time.

[PatriotRadioMilitia]

@lso5027 provide a single name of a single person who watch a airliner in person not tv

[warhawk9845]

You really want me to believe this didnt happen??

[CNN911Fakes]

@MrSound2Soul I'm surprised you can't stay on subject. This video does not discuss or raise the issue at all of what eyewitnesses did or didn't see and subsequently report. CNN aired this faked video of a plane flying behind the towers followed closely by a mighty explosion. It expresses no opinion about whether a plane really hit wtc2 or not.

This CNN video, like all videos of the wtc2 event we currently have access to, is a fake. A very obvious and cheap fake. Shown live at Times Square.

[alexandriasdh3185]

@MrSound2Soul

thank you!!!!

[MrSound2Soul]

Looks like someone is wrong ;)

[MrSound2Soul]

Also if you dont respond to my previous comments that means you are wrong ;)

[MrSound2Soul]

@CNN911Fakes And I guess all the people who were on the ground and say they saw the plane hit the tower hit were liars? The thousands and thousands of people who saw the plane hit are all plants the government used to propagate their cover story? The firefighters, policemen, and just average citizens are lying? I am sure you "proved" people are lying as well. I am suprised you have enough brain power to even know how to breathe.

[CNN911Fakes]

@MrSound2Soul said

"What about the literal hundreds of videos showing the planes hit the tower. I am sure those are all faked as well,"

Yup, every one has been proven faked. I have proven several myself, most recently the fairbanks video, again.

You are welcome to prove I made a mistake in the analysis.