Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: Dawkins Stumped?!? Let me answer!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,038
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 7, 2011

This is a response to imrational's video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmJKZPpH80A that was a response to a video showing Richard Dawkins being "stumped." This is my first video. Hope you like it. Feel free to comment.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to Dawkins Stumped?!? Let me answer!
see all

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @NeyoPro yep!

  • Hi, I'm asking this question sincerely seeking the truth. Do you know if there are any theories of how the DNA replication process might have originated in the primordial soup without intelligent design? Thanks!

  • @prendes4 Futher XXY,XYY,and XXX, all do have downfalls that make them a hamper. Studies show that all three lead to learning disabilities, and speech problems in nearly 50%. So with the fact that it can in someway hampers a human and in no way helps; and the fact that it is not passed on (or inheirited) it does not fit the theory of evolution.

  • @prendes4 Not sure about the coparison to being born blind but good comment. I would like to add as well though that Darwins theory states that an evolution it to help a species. XYY does not really help in any way. Also, I would like to point out the fact that studies show testosterone remains normal it does not increase. Moreover, xyy,xxx,xxy, are shown not to be inheirited.

  • Keep in mind during this comment that I am a staunch Creationist but I am going to approach this video as if I were not. I cannot understand why anyone would use down's syndrome as an example to answer this question. If you were going to answer this, XYY is much better. It has no negative side effects and can be passed on. Down's Syndrome is considered, by any objective viewpoint, a deformity. It is not, nor could it be considered under any conditions, positive. It is like being born blind.

  • beyond trisomies, i think we could look to mutations such as isochromosomes or even robertsonian translocations; examples of extra genetic material at the level of the chromosome.

    atleast that was my thought when i saw that initial 'dawkins stumped' video.

  • Dat ass in the background 

  • Boring, but essentially correct.

  • BOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRR­IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNN­GGGGGGGGG. Sorry dude you have about the same interest level of a dead dung beetle... (dead)

  • Duplicate information is not additional information and the result of xyy sydrome is still detrimenttal. There is also no species that resulted from xyy sydrome.

    Learn some real science,

    watch?v=qZev7hb40uk

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more