Loose Change Debate 911 Program 1 Part 2

The first of two programs debating the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center with the makers of Loose Change Dylan Avery, Jason Bermas and to counter Mark Roberts. The program is chaired by Ronald Wicke.

The host Ronald Wicke is not an impartial he says he is not impartial a couple of times so don't bother pointing out the bleeding obvious.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• debunking
• WTC1
• WTC2
• WT7
• Twin
• Towers
• Dylan
• Avery
• Jason
• Bermas
• Loose
• Change
• Hardfire
• 911
• 9/11
• Controlled
• Demolition

[JohnnieNaked]

These two are totally fucking brainless. It's unbelievable how thick headed they are. It's actually literally disgusting.

[erikssonjonas10]

@RHallman321 You have watched too many Youtube conspiracy videos, friend. None of your claims are true. Go ahead now and fact check them from other sources than you have. Start with the "nearly free-fall"-speed thing and then get back to this thread. Just as an experiment.

[LxE100]

@JohnnieNaked Yeah, it's pretty obvious a lot of morons were watching this video around the same time you left that comment. Make a comment about Loose Change on a Ron Paul video like that. It would be marked as spam in seconds.

[JohnnieNaked]

Top rated comment bitch!

[LxE100]

@JohnnieNaked Nice rant faggot. Too bad they're correct.

[SRTtoZ]

@robinsonjd1978 While I agree, the best answer is the loose change 'theory' is so fucking ludicrous that even he cant hold back from throwing a few comments here and there. It is what it is.

[robinsonjd1978]

I thougt procters were supposed to be impartial when they are conducting opinionated discussions. Why is this hit so bias towards the loose change guys.

[bakerjay138]

@JohnnieNaked r u a fuking jew?if so go fuk ur self with ur dead dads cock