Undecided Superdelegate Sets His Price: $20M

An undecided Calif. superdelegate says it'll cost $20 million for him to pick either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton for president. Steven Ybarra wants that amount to register Mexican-American voters and get them to the polls in November. (May 8)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• superdelegates
• price
• tag
• undecided
• superdelegate
• sets
• price:
• $20m

[vertigate]

What an idiot.

[neotoy]

LOL, the very idea of "super delegates" is absurd.. This whole thing has become a stupid political circus. I guess you get what you pay for..

[papsgotclaps]

are you talking about white people mother fucker, cause I'm half indian and I know your people killed and stealed for money power and greed fucking hypocrite. Take a good long look in the mirror if you want to see an true illegal bitch.

[cujocommander]

everyone here is retarded. no wonder bush gets elected twice

[SHARDNAZ]

just like any other community. All you have to do is look in the prisons and realize that it's not just Latin@s in there...wow, you are so ignorant....

[SHARDNAZ]

uhhh, hello...that's what the money is for......

[ponlur]

so what?It´s all about money in the US.

Money talks.... either you heve it or don´t.

I would even ask for more because in the end

20 Million dollar is almost nothing.

[Nakmpg72]

What a disgraceful failure of a person.

[creedsuxass]

Instead of asking for money for a vote, pick the candidate that's the best for the job. He just wants 20 million dollars to get the hispanic vote? Why doesn't he try to just get "people" to vote.

[portena]

What a scumbag! It's illegal under federal laws to sell or buy votes. He should be brought up on corruption charges and no longer allowed to be a superdelegate.

[publicplea]

Let me get this right...they kill, steal AND commit crimes? We should just simplify things by making killing and stealing a crime as well. Who's with me?!

[publicplea]

Very true. If our Founding Fathers wanted a democracy they would have made one. We are a republic (or supposed to be)not to be confused with todays definition of republican. It's funny how the one candidate that's not full of crap doesn't get any coverage. I guess people rather be lied to by dirty politicians who aim to destroy individual liberty. Does anyone have any dirt on Ron Paul? Is there any reason he should not be our president? I can't find one.