This video is unavailable.
Answering Climate Change Skeptics, Naomi Oreskes
757
Subscription preferences
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
32,606
253
42
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like UniversityOfRI's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike UniversityOfRI's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add UniversityOfRI's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Mar 3, 2010
A presentation based off of her recent book, Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscure the Truth about Climate Change. Naomi Oreskes, author and professor of history and science studies, University of California, San Diego.
From the University of Rhode Island's Spring 2010 Vetlesen Lecture Series, People and Planet Global Environmental Change. March 2, 2010.
Help us caption & translate this video!
http://amara.org/v/CCE2/
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
52:16
Climate I: Is The Debate Over?by The Agenda with Steve PaikinFeatured
10,003
-
1:16:20
Harvard professor Daniel Schrag talks at URI on Climate Changeby UniversityOfRI
2,009 views
-
1:24:12
Honors Colloquium - "The Web Within Us: When Minds and Machines Become One"by UniversityOfRI
1,930 views
-
1:02:17
Saving the Blue Planet. By Boris Wormby UniversityOfRI
1,117 views
-
3:35
Tuna: A Sustainable New Industryby UniversityOfRI
284 views
-
1:03:24
Climate Science Debate : Global Warming Alarmist VS. Global Warming Skepticby CheckThrice2
15,820 views
-
10:32
Global Warming Skeptic Bell: CO2 Hoax Biggest Climate Change Lieby NewsmaxTV
9,121 views
-
53:52
Frontline: Climate of Doubt #public #opinion #denialby ClimateState
11,369 views
-
16
videos
Play all
Climate Change Denialby ClimateProgressWorld
-
9:52
Al Gore - I Was Wrong About Global Warming... Learn About It.mp4by MrJacktemplar
37,165 views
-
53:25
Catastrophic Climate Change & Runaway Global Warming - David Wasdellby GlobalClimateNews
9,115 views
-
1:27:32
Discovery Channel - Global Warming, What You Need To Know, with Tom Brokawby ClimateState
450,670 views
-
9:11
Why The Global Warming Agenda Is Wrongby encounterbooks
143,812 views
-
1:46:59
Climate Change: Ask an expert - public lecture Jan 2010by ANUchannel
2,489 views
-
41:01
Climate Change 2010: Where do we go from here? Professor Will Steffen. March 2010, ANUby ANUchannel
3,402 views
-
57:17
Lord Christopher Monckton ends the Global Warming Debate and proves its a Hoaxby Muslims and the World
906 views
-
57:51
Merchants of Doubt: Naomi Oreskes on Climate Skepticism - LASCO-ELI conference (Part 1)by UCLouvainLASCO
890 views
-
10:07
The Huge Mistake - Climate Change Solutions 2009by Kirsten Stade
70,378 views
-
20:18
How to talk to a climate change denierby visionontv
11,552 views
-
3:14
Naomi Oreskes deconstructs Nick Minchin's climate denialby John Cook
14,559 views
-
58:01
Pirate Television: Naomi Oreskes - Merchants of Doubtby freespeechtv
313 views
- Loading more suggestions...
All Comments (1,700)
PrairleDoggedRez 1 week ago
If you want to know the time ask a geologist.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
MrApplewine 1 week ago
The non-believers will be cleansed !
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
roskkva 1 month ago
Denial of science is not the same thing as denial of politicians who work with scientists. The technical advisers to the White House may be the most advanced in history, but that by no means guarantees that the decisions made will be the right ones. The Third Reich had the finest nuclear scientists in the world - did that make their military or economic strategy 'right'?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
roskkva 1 month ago
Other governments did try and increase taxes on fuel etc. years ago -it did not have the effect she claims it will, people just behaved differently and adjusted to the obstacle, then carried on with a course of action that fitted into the wider economic environment that still used fossil fuels.This is why Al Gore wants you to wear more jumpers and stay in doors while he runs a massive mansion and his colleagues in government increase funding to the biggest fuel consumer in the world- the US army
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
roskkva 1 month ago
she's also wrong that scientists need to take part in more touring programs and communicate in the 'right' way -science speaks for itself if it's expressed in a simple language that can become popular science discussed between citizens, educating one another, rather than being lectured to by their superiors. Conspiracy theories result from a perfectly sensible distrust of 'campaigns' -in a true democracy citizens convince one another, science on the other hand simply presents structured evidence
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
roskkva 1 month ago
Reliable science might be a good basis for political action, but what that action is exactly becomes even more important than the initial decision. e.g. academic statistics/'science' have been used to offer 'positive discrimination' policies in University science faculties, leading to the decision to ignore the cause of disadvantage in the first place i.e. poverty, generational malnourishment and lack of school education. The superficial solution hides the root problem which remains and grows.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
roskkva 1 month ago
There's no net 'cost' to sensible policies. We have massive tax revenues in all western governments - if we stop wasting vast amounts of money trying to save corrupt business models and illegal wars and instead spend that money on updating technology, we remove the need to go hunting about the world for oil and remove the need for extra 'green' programs and as a bi-product create a better more efficient economy. Our work already produces a surplus - it get squandered chasing after debt and wars.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
roskkva 1 month ago
I went to a technology fair as a boy that claimed we would have electric cars in only 10 years & nuclear fusion shortly after - here we are 20 years later and all we've got is a butt ugly Prius. Instead of arguing over who lies more, why don't the governments independently do what their populations have been asking for for years and encourage businesses to update the technology and make our lives easier. People don't want to be polluters, the culture encourages it as the UN utopians lecture us.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
roskkva 1 month ago
what an inappropriate quote to end on - Maynard Keynes - the guy who spread the idea of the false impression of a free meal, telling us there is no free meal (no shit) - when we switched over to new technologies in the past like the printing press, not only was there very little social strife, but it actually democratised the ability to make a good living and be informed. Now we're supposed to accept drastic reductions in population and living standards to help one central body update technology
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube