Oklahoma City Bombing Conspiracy debunked, sorta (part 2)
Top Comments
All Comments (17)
-
Since the conspiracy theory is that the additional bombs didn't go off, I don't see their point.
-
When did FEMA get a mandate to do anything but "continuity of government"? They couldn't even get Katrina right. Don't you wonder why, when they have been funded for years, supposedly for such things?
"They" tried the Fema report BS with building 7 too.
Now get to the part about the employees not going to work, reported explosives not detonated, FBI case blocked, and the rest.
-
You're an idiot. watch the Youtube Video "OKC bombing Rare footage" The local news crew repoted LIVE bombs INSIDE the building. One had exploded, two were left. Why does this STUPID propaganda lie to the lazy sheeple. The reason there were TWO explosions was the truck AND the bomb in the building. yeah, trust FEMA, they cut polic emergency communications lines during Katrina. Mikecavazos, you are a DISINFO agent. Burn in hell satanic fascist liar.
-
Really? LOL.
The funny thing is that every witness on site heard two explosions too! Hhehehe.
And there were multiple, confirmed reports of two other charges that did not go off in the building.
You are a dumbass believer in what authority tell you.
-
I guess all you idiots ignore the fact that the two seismic spikes were caused by one blast traveling through two mediums (air and land). But regardless of fact, you conspiracy nut jobs will ignore whatever puts a damper on your concocted wet dreams.
"I do believe that it is the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel." Rosie O'Donnell
-
How much funding did this establishment receive to 'debunk' this conspiracy and who paid for it?
Watch this happen again with 9/11... the proof is in the pudding and the pudding tastes rotten!
-
"but the FBI put a statement out saying the exact same thing then it was never heard of again?"
When you say something that is incorrect, you ought to never say it again. If there was a conspiracy, why would they say it in the first place?
"she was cut off after reporting the collapse, is this coincidence?"
Possibly, if it were a conspiracy, why would they cut her off and only draw further suspicion? It wouldn't be the only false alarm on 9/11.
-
your right there, but the FBI put a statement out saying the exact same thing then it was never heard of again?
It was the BBC that said that the solamans building ahd collapsed (WTC7) before it happened and half way throught the report by Jane Standley she was cut off after reporting the collapse, is this coincidence?
News reports on 9/11 said that WTC7 had collapsed when it was still standing. The news isn't always right.
DkEugen 3 years ago 4
It wouldnt fall down so they wont do it lol.
ctufc 3 years ago