I gave you EXACTLY what you asked for--a PLACE to find the article--Church owned Deseret News.
This is what I ALWAYS try to do--give references. When I don't/can't, I SAY SO, as I did in my orig.statement and left everyone the option of following up on the info, THEMSELVES.
Shawn could have thrown out some numbers as if they were true (IF he were the liar you claim he is). He DIDN'T DO THAT!! He ADMITTED he didn't have the source nailed down. I was trying to assist.
@42apostate "But, then...what else is there for you to do, BUT deny?!?" Don't forget the "you can't or do not want to understand" or "you should learn how to read better" tags he gives to anything/anyone who disagrees with him. You have pegged Gomez to the tee!! As a Mormon, that's all he can do. I do give him a little credit. He at least didn't play the anti-mormon card that all Mormons play. But if our conversation would have kept going, he would have thrown that out eventually.
@42apostate - Sorry pal, I didn´t demand anything I just called you to provide some evidence but you just can't. You should learn that if you're going to try to use something to help a cause, you'd better have it handy or not to mention it. It just makes you look bad. I tell you that when I use an article to prove anything I make sure I know where is that article and if possible or if necessary I show the source. That surely proves my point and gives me the credibility you don't have now.
YOU are the only one, recently, that has demanded "simple answers". Shawn certainly didn't.
Some day someone WILL pay for that article and spread it around YouTube. When they do, I'll be sure that you get a copy of it.
Then what??? What will your cry be then? I would guess that the next boohoo for you would be simply to deny the article's existence--right in the face of it being placed before you in all it's glory!
But, then...what else is there for you to do, BUT deny?!?!
That's true. YOU DON'T have to authenticate ANYTHING! (And you don't!) It is ALWAYS WE who must produce authentication.
That's known in our circles as an LDS DOUBLE STANDARD!!
If I WANTED to pay for the info you demand, I'd certainly accomodate. I don't--and WON'T. You now know where to go for the article. I've done my job--provided the source. The ball is in YOUR court. It's no skin off my pelotas if you choose not to follow up!--and you won't...oh well...
@42apostate - Again, I don't have to AUTHENTICATE anything. You brought the purported report to the conversation. If anyone was to provide AUTHENTICATION that would have been you. No worries. It probably didn't ever exist, but who cares. Thank you though. As I said the fact that either you don't want or cant produce such information leads me to believe that the information wasn't probably credible.
Trust the uploader of the video to gloss over the important point of the video to and obsess over how much the money part.
JediLDS 5 months ago
@alexgomez2
AGAIN!!
IF I HAD presented you with the source AND the article, what would that have done for you?
I know EXACTLY what you'd have done!! You would have continued to lay down the blanket of denials, tho the evidence was right there in front of you.
Thanks for demonstrating the standard LDS dishonesty, alex!! Keep up the good work!!
And again--I wasn't talking to you in my orig. comment, was I? Why should I accomodate YOU? You somebody speshhhaaaalll?
42apostate 7 months ago
@alexgomez2
I gave you EXACTLY what you asked for--a PLACE to find the article--Church owned Deseret News.
This is what I ALWAYS try to do--give references. When I don't/can't, I SAY SO, as I did in my orig.statement and left everyone the option of following up on the info, THEMSELVES.
Shawn could have thrown out some numbers as if they were true (IF he were the liar you claim he is). He DIDN'T DO THAT!! He ADMITTED he didn't have the source nailed down. I was trying to assist.
42apostate 7 months ago
@42apostate "But, then...what else is there for you to do, BUT deny?!?" Don't forget the "you can't or do not want to understand" or "you should learn how to read better" tags he gives to anything/anyone who disagrees with him. You have pegged Gomez to the tee!! As a Mormon, that's all he can do. I do give him a little credit. He at least didn't play the anti-mormon card that all Mormons play. But if our conversation would have kept going, he would have thrown that out eventually.
TheJpgr1958 7 months ago
@42apostate - Sorry pal, I didn´t demand anything I just called you to provide some evidence but you just can't. You should learn that if you're going to try to use something to help a cause, you'd better have it handy or not to mention it. It just makes you look bad. I tell you that when I use an article to prove anything I make sure I know where is that article and if possible or if necessary I show the source. That surely proves my point and gives me the credibility you don't have now.
alexgomez2 7 months ago
@alexgomez2
YOU are the only one, recently, that has demanded "simple answers". Shawn certainly didn't.
Some day someone WILL pay for that article and spread it around YouTube. When they do, I'll be sure that you get a copy of it.
Then what??? What will your cry be then? I would guess that the next boohoo for you would be simply to deny the article's existence--right in the face of it being placed before you in all it's glory!
But, then...what else is there for you to do, BUT deny?!?!
42apostate 7 months ago
@alexgomez2
That's true. YOU DON'T have to authenticate ANYTHING! (And you don't!) It is ALWAYS WE who must produce authentication.
That's known in our circles as an LDS DOUBLE STANDARD!!
If I WANTED to pay for the info you demand, I'd certainly accomodate. I don't--and WON'T. You now know where to go for the article. I've done my job--provided the source. The ball is in YOUR court. It's no skin off my pelotas if you choose not to follow up!--and you won't...oh well...
42apostate 7 months ago
@42apostate - I'd ask you not to be so cruel to Shawn. Thank you!
alexgomez2 7 months ago
@42apostate - Again, I don't have to AUTHENTICATE anything. You brought the purported report to the conversation. If anyone was to provide AUTHENTICATION that would have been you. No worries. It probably didn't ever exist, but who cares. Thank you though. As I said the fact that either you don't want or cant produce such information leads me to believe that the information wasn't probably credible.
alexgomez2 7 months ago
@alexgomez2
The simple minded are usually the ones that demand "simple answer(s)"!
42apostate 7 months ago