Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Rachel Maddow responds to Bobby Jindal's awful response president Obama's speech

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
16,246
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 27, 2009

Gov. Bobby Jindal's task tonight, to rebut President Obama's first address to a joint session of Congress, was a thankless one. But it still constituted an opportunity for the Louisiana Republican to show that he could handle the national spotlight, present himself as a fresh face of the Republican Party, and stand up to the current president oratorically.

On each of these three hurdles, he came up short. Both Democrats and Republicans alike panned Jindal's rebuttal in terms that were decidedly harsh: "amateurish," "laughable" and, most commonly, "a missed opportunity."

"After watching Jindal," one Democratic strategist emailed, "I'd pay a lot of money to be back watching a Palin speech."

"Awkward with capital A," emailed another.

The punditry was equally brutal. Part of the problem was the crux of Jindal's address, which consisted almost entirely of red meat for conservatives. The Governor offered criticism for anything other than tax cuts and ridiculed government spending for items that are either widely supported -- "$8 billion for high-speed rail" -- or seemingly essential -- "$140 million for something called 'volcano monitoring'" (isn't Louisiana Exhibit A in the need for natural disaster warning?).

"You know, I think Bobby Jindal is a very promising politician," said New York Times columnist David Brooks, appearing on PBS, "and I oppose the stimulus because I thought it was poorly drafted. But to come up at this moment in history with a stale "government is the problem," "we can't trust the federal government" -- it's just a disaster for the Republican Party. The country is in a panic right now. They may not like the way the Democrats have passed the stimulus bill, but that idea ... that government is going to have no role, the federal government has no role in this ... it's just a form of nihilism. It's just not where the country is, it's not where the future of the country is. There's an intra-Republican debate."

And yet, much of the critique of Jindal's address focused on his hokey, folksy, seemingly-forced tone and vernacular. The Governor, who has never held court on the national stage before -- remember, his speech at the Republican convention was called off after Hurricane Gustav made landfall -- showed a bit of wetness behind the ears. And the commentators let him have it, even on Fox News.

BRIT HUME: "The speech read a lot better than it sounded. This was not Bobby Jindal's greatest oratorical moment."

NINA EASTON: "The delivery was not exactly terrific."

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: "Jindal didn't have a chance. He follows Obama, who in making speeches, is in a league of his own. He's in a Reagan-esque league. ... [Jindal] tried the best he could."

JUAN WILLIAMS: "It came off as amateurish, and even the tempo in which he spoke was sing-songy. He was telling stories that seemed very simplistic and almost childish.


All said, the speech was received with disappointment by conservatives who have looked to the Governor as the Republican Party's next star. Jindal's background and resume -- he was raised by Indian-immigrant parents and has an undisputed intellect -- seem, at least superficially, like key pillars upon which to forge a new kind of GOP candidacy. But other politicians have been panned for their State of the Union rebuttals in the past and managed to achieve national success, including Gov. Tim Kaine, who now heads the DNC, and Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, who appears poised to be nominated Secretary of Health and Human Services.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/25/bobby-jindal-response-pan_n_169710.html

  • likes, 25 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Rachel Maddow, in 2001, she earned a Doctorate in Philosophy (DPhil) in politics from Oxford University. Her thesis is titled HIV/AIDS and Health Care Reform in British and American Prisons (supervisor: Dr Lucia Zedner). She is the first openly gay American to win a Rhodes scholarship. But righty Trolls on YouBube are smarter than she is. Yeah, right !

  • lol - Dude couldn't be more fake

see all

All Comments (242)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • woman, when I want your opinion I'll give it to you

  • @LilithProductions What debates? I can't find any. She is a spinner like O'Reilly.

  • @judoskeleton She's generally pretty successful in the debates I've seen her do.

  • Does she ever debate anyone? Its pretty easy to debate a video clip that you have edited.

  • @ccsmiley2 Youtube is my favorite source because people like me and you can exchange ideas. It doesn't bother me if we differ, we can talk about it though. Sure, I watch tv sometimes to get the gist of what may be in the news, but I don't easily fall prey to their agendas like I did when I was younger. I also check google for Top Stories, or search a topic that I may be interested in and read several articles from as many different sources as I can. I always read the comments too.

  • @ThePelicans44 where do you mainly get your news from?

  • @ccsmiley2 LOL anyone that uses cable news as their main source of news is a spoonfed idiot. I dont care if its FOX or msnbc

  • @ThePelicans44 LOL! who is making themselves look like an idiot?

  • @ceoproperties As lesbian myself let me say fuck you, I'm one A quality girl, but i guess you only base it on breast says and ass again how foolish of you.

    P.S. you can take your hot beef injection and stick it up your own ass, it hear guys find that very pleasurable.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more