Secret History: Kinsey's Paedophiles (4/6)

This is a Yorkshire Television production for Channel 4, produced and directed by Tim Tate, aired August 10, 1998. The show features interviews with Kinsey team members Paul Gebhard and Clarence Tripp, Kinsey Institute director John Bancroft and several of Kinsey's biographers.

Here is an original press release of the production:
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/old/timtate.htm

Parts of this show are cited in this chapter:
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/chapter7.pdf

from Dr. Reisman's book Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences:
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2005/08/kinsey_crimes_c_1.html

Also see The Kinsey Coverup:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3704337510629412177

and The Kinsey Syndrome:
http://www.thekinseysyndrome.com/

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Alfred Kinsey
• Paul Gebhard
• Clarence Tripp
• Wardell Pomeroy
• Clyde Martin
• The Kinsey Institute
• John Bancroft
• Mr. Green
• Fritz von Balluseck
• child sexual abuse
• Children of Table 34
• Judith Reisman
• Tim Tate
• sex education
• science fraud
• human sexuality research
• documentary
• pedophilia
• paedophilia

[AlphaKillaX]

this guy that is seen at 4:05, this mother fucker is laughing throughout the whole interview about kids being molested, what the fuck is wrong with him?

[funk7000]

Yeah that Hollywood movie has got ppl thinking he's the greatest thing and the end all be all. I just had this lesbian tell me that she thought that he changed the lesbian's lives for the better. Little does she know that all of his female sexuality research was based off of strippers and prostitutes, and then passed that off as normal sexual behaviors, ompletely unrepresentative of the average American female, lesbian or straight.

[phillipgaley]

@valis8536 In the academic setting in the USA, Kinsey is relied upon but with never a mention of his barbarity, . . .

[valis8536]

They would defend the longitudinal study necrophiliac serial killers.

[MichieHoward]

Not that I am defending Kinsey, because after finding out how "extensive" the child molester "research" was, if Green molested hundreds, not one or two out of the hundreds told their parents, or teacher, and reported it to the police, sex with children was against the law in the 40's and 50's. I mean bad parenting to top it off.

[FeignofCordor]

@ItsMartynn

There must be something wrong with you

[FeignofCordor]

@AlphaKillaX

I agree I think that whole institute just gets off on the material they can read and watch on film all supposedly in the name of science

[ItsMartynn]

Although it is wrong and children were suffering, They have a valid point, If you can better understand it then you may have a better chance to treat it or avoid it.

So i can see it from Kinsey's point of view, Although i don't fully agree with his decisions not to report it.

[peekaboo67]

I hope all pedos and Kinsey rot in hell!!!

[rowsofvoices9]

Kinsey was funded by the Rockefeller's.

[mainsqueeze1977]

That he was convicted anyway doesn't matter. Kinsey did protect a criminal which could have resulted in his not being convicted.

[mainsqueeze1977]

Even if it were relevant (and science is about knowing as much as possible), this doesn't dispense Kinsey from ethical boundaries - but since he aimed at removing exactly these, he sure had no problem with condoning such activities.