Top Comments
All Comments (76)
-
@tobiasaurusrex Thomas Kean was critisized for his book Without Precedent'' by all detectives that supplied information for the 9/11 Commission Report, why? It was misguiding, Kean made lots of profit from its misguiding claims.
Peter Thatchell has no direct investigative work on 9/11.
Your using the falasity of authority to try and validate your claim, use scientific fact my friend, this stands the test of time.
Flight 93 mostly disintegrated but metal parts were visible. FACT
-
Nice fable. Yes, you will perpetually invent some red herring like a good dog.
For everyone who is not jerry:
Read "Without Precedent" the chairman and co-chairman of the 9/11 Commission Report admit it's lies, and they wrote it.
Short view, search for the Guardian UK's article: "9/11 - the big cover up?" by Peter Thatchell
-
@tobiasaurusrex The pieces of metal disintegrates but most were visible to the nacked eye [google images of the crater].
Also, Parts of the engine, like the turbine, were found a few yards off the crater, one in a pond.
As i had stated, things don't disapear but they can disintegrate into smaller or microscopic pieces depending on how hard the object is and the force in which it collides.
I just hope one day you wake up & realize 99% of your conspiracy theories ARE disinformation and lies.
-
I'm glad you agree that planes don't disappear. I like how you turn "mostly" into "completely", ignoring passenger seating, landing gear, 9' titanium turbine loaded engines (NOT plastic at all) landing gear, the lightning transfer layer around the plane, etc.
You are slick at spreading disinformation, but the fatal flaw of disinformation is that it's lies, and lies cannot stand up to time and scrutiny.
-
WTF!!! where the fuck is that plane that crashes into sea!?what is this shit? i disappoint!
-
@tobiasaurusrex Youv still got your science mixed up with reality, ill explain this phenomena as simple as possible;
a. nothing can disappear then now or ever.
b. planes are mostly made of plastic and fiberglass, they don't need to travel the speed of a meteorite to disintegrate.
c; when you add fuel into the factor, disintegration has higher possibility of occurring.
-
Well, when planes can fly at the speed of an impacting meteor (~ 40,000mph), I'll believe that a plane crash will leave zero to only negligible debris. Until then, planes don't disappear.
-
@BrokenSentence (crash threw the wall) OOOHHHH YEEEEAAAHHH!!!!
-
@tobiasaurusrex what disinformation? Its universally accepted that if two solid objects hit each other hard enough disintegration will occur [which is NOT the same as disappearing, so get that fantasy out of your head].
-
@admiralcrash1 YEah man... this must be more of that trrrrr our omnipotent DHS warning us helpless foolz about. man I'm thirsty..
This is all fake. Everyone knows that planes don't leave debris anymore. It all just desintigrates on impact and fish n' crabs ate the rest. Make sure you express yourself by voting, pay your taxes, and keep drinking the flouride.
admiralcrash1 6 months ago 38
@BNPpatriot
LOL...
r0ll0t0masi 6 months ago 23