Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Destroyed tanks of ww2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
67,587
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 11, 2010

Destroyed tanks

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (theultrapaul123)

  • do we really have to have the gun shots

  • @18tangles no sorry it was the only thing i could find

  • 00:09 lol... serious?? :-) how that happened?

  • @Dukestylez the t-34 rammed it and the force lifted the turret off

  • no stugs ;-)

    

  • @bobbbylon sorry couldnt find any pics

see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @YoughMama Good post-mortem on the T-34. I'm betting no Germans stuck around to pour gunfire into the disabled tank. I'm also betting the poor Ivan tank driver got court-martialed.

  • @pepeelvivaso in fact it is a t34 prototype, hence the long cannon that t28 didnt have, believi it is t34a1 in western coding

  • @YoughMama - Little Willie was first refered as a 'tank' as in water tank to try to keep it secret. Now what you mean to say that while many nations had tanks, the Germans in WW2 did not call Stugs & other antik-tank/self propelled artillery Panzers because they had no turret. The German's maning these weapons didn't consider themselves as 'tankers' & did not wear black uniforms as the Panzer crews did but rather the ensignia and uniform of the Wehrmarct artillery. Stugs were best on defence.

  • @the82spartans Stugs are tanks, tanks dont have to have turrets, the vehicles for which "tank" was coined, Little Willie and the Mark I ("land ship" back then), didnt have full turrets. If you want something to distinguish a "tank" from a "self-propelled gun", you will have to find something else.

  • @Dukestylez I would have to agree with theultra, probably the T-34 rammed the Pak 40, the barrel of the AT gun slid up the front glacis and caught the T-34 main gun. The gun's legs dug into the ground levering the turret off. Probably the remaining Germans poured gunfire and grenades into the opening and killed the crew. Quite amazing, but I see no other explanation.

  • ps

    love the sound effects of rounds going off!

  • stugs are not tanks... this is excellent.

    Thanks so much for the upload. Many pic's I had not seen.

    5 *'s

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more